<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSA2000: Multiple Snapshots, data consistency in HPE EVA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568909#M42484</link>
    <description>...Anyone? Please?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob_69_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-26T10:43:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA2000: Multiple Snapshots, data consistency</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568908#M42483</link>
      <description>Hi all, I'd like to know if, taking snapshots of more than one Volume at the same time, using a single command, e.g.:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;create snapshots master-volumes DATA_01,DATA_02 SNAP_01,SNAP_02&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;would result in a consistent "situation", should a rollback of ALL the volumes be necessary for any reasons.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For instance: a Database with data files spreaded on different Volumes. In case of rollback, would data be consistent?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think the mechanism should be meant to provide consistency, otherwise it wouldn't be possible to specify more than one snapshot creation at a time, within a single statement. But I'd like to be sure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for any insights...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PS as stated in the subject, the SAN storage is an MSA2000 (2012FC)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568908#M42483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob_69_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-21T17:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000: Multiple Snapshots, data consistency</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568909#M42484</link>
      <description>...Anyone? Please?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568909#M42484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob_69_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T10:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000: Multiple Snapshots, data consistency</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568910#M42485</link>
      <description>Yes, the MSA2000 products will perform a time consistent snap of ALL volumes specified on the CLI command line.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your desire to create a data consistent snapshot of  multiple volumes is possible as long as your ensure each OS logical drive using such MSA2000 volumes are quiesced so the I/O is flushed prior to your snap shot time.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568910#M42485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan Pyper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-30T07:08:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000: Multiple Snapshots, data consistency</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568911#M42486</link>
      <description>Hi Dan, thanks for your feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you please be a bit more specific and bring a practical example of "logical drives" needing to be quiesced at OS level, prior taking the snapshot(s)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In my understanding, a snapshot can be taken without stopping I/O to the disks... But maybe you were referring to things like "LVOL" or other software tools to sub-partition "hardware defined" Logical Volumes / LUNs ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/msa2000-multiple-snapshots-data-consistency/m-p/4568911#M42486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob_69_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-30T10:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

