<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Basic question and query for resources in HPE EVA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241231#M6234</link>
    <description>Jonathan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I never heard the 'avoid zoning over multiple switches' argument. On the other hand one needs to be careful during fabric design so that the ISLs (inter-switch links) do not get overloaded with traffic, but that is a question of performance, not reachability.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks to me that your fellow has made an error during zoning changes/setup. I assure you that can even happen with a single switch (I know it - guess why ;-)</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-04-06T09:20:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basic question and query for resources</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241230#M6233</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;  We've run into a problem with cascading switches and zoning.  The limited information on the 'net says to avoid zoning over multiple switches.  But an fellow admin zoned over the switches ( using java gui ), due to a problem with MSA1000 and host usability.  Pre-zoning we had multiple switches with backups running fine. now the backup devices are gone from the hosts except the host on the same switch with the tape lib.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The above showed how little is availible online for fiber channel.  Are there any good online resources for FC?  Any suggestions for books?  and I am signed up for &lt;A href="http://education.itrc.hp.com/TrainerII/en_US/catalog/catalogDetail.jsp?id=prod1280004" target="_blank"&gt;http://education.itrc.hp.com/TrainerII/en_US/catalog/catalogDetail.jsp?id=prod1280004&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;are there others?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241230#M6233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan E. Deady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-06T09:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic question and query for resources</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241231#M6234</link>
      <description>Jonathan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I never heard the 'avoid zoning over multiple switches' argument. On the other hand one needs to be careful during fabric design so that the ISLs (inter-switch links) do not get overloaded with traffic, but that is a question of performance, not reachability.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks to me that your fellow has made an error during zoning changes/setup. I assure you that can even happen with a single switch (I know it - guess why ;-)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241231#M6234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-06T09:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic question and query for resources</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241232#M6235</link>
      <description>Thanks, again I didn't find much.  A USENet post was were I saw the "avoid multi SW zoning".  We have single switches that are zone without issue.  I'll review what we have, I really dis-like brocade's cli...  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241232#M6235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan E. Deady</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-06T09:29:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic question and query for resources</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241233#M6236</link>
      <description>I cant agree with the "Don't zone over multiple switches" statement.  I have 2 redundant 18-switch fabrics, 2 redundant 6-switch fabrics, and 2 redundant 2-switch fabrics.  Storage/servers is spread across everything except the "Cores" on the 18-switch fabric.  It works!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your problem could be that the person that used the GUI tool enabled zoning and/or wrote a new config file that did not include your previous zones.  Or, he might have removed the tape library alias, and re-added it back only to the one switch.  Either way he did something stupid to mess up your fabric.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mike Naime</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 19:36:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/basic-question-and-query-for-resources/m-p/3241233#M6236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Naime</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-04-06T19:36:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

