<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetRAID 4M &amp;amp; MSCS Quorum RAID in Netservers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632114#M1044</link>
    <description>Thanks for your reply but...&lt;BR /&gt;How the OS can see a RAID1 logical drive (or Diskset) as two different halves? And in which circumstances (hw failure you said) there is this possibility?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Francesco Tamba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-12-18T09:57:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetRAID 4M &amp; MSCS Quorum RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632112#M1042</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;recently HP made an update to their "installation an configuration guide"&lt;BR /&gt;for their SCSI controller certified for MSCS, NetRAID 4M.&lt;BR /&gt;The first release of this guide was on march 2001 without any remarkable&lt;BR /&gt;issue. At the begin of November they made this update:&lt;BR /&gt;"HP recommends creating a fault-tolerant RAID type, such as RAID-5 for the&lt;BR /&gt;shared quorum drive. RAID-1 mirrors are NOT recommended for the shared&lt;BR /&gt;quorum when using the HP NetRAID-4M controller".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now, is there anybody that also use HP hardware for MSCS and noticed this?&lt;BR /&gt;Any comments? I can't see any damn good technical reason for this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Francesco&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632112#M1042</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Tamba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-18T08:58:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetRAID 4M &amp; MSCS Quorum RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632113#M1043</link>
      <description>The reason for this is that there's a very little chance that, in case of hardware failures, the quorum disk splits in halves and each node owns one copy of the quorum.&lt;BR /&gt;This could lead to some 'unwanted' results.&lt;BR /&gt;Since the possibility that this will happen is so small, RAID1 is still supported, but just not recommended</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632113#M1043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Hogeveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-18T09:13:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetRAID 4M &amp; MSCS Quorum RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632114#M1044</link>
      <description>Thanks for your reply but...&lt;BR /&gt;How the OS can see a RAID1 logical drive (or Diskset) as two different halves? And in which circumstances (hw failure you said) there is this possibility?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632114#M1044</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francesco Tamba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-18T09:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetRAID 4M &amp; MSCS Quorum RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632115#M1045</link>
      <description>When this occurs, the RAID1 splits in halves and each physical disk is owned by one of the nodes.&lt;BR /&gt;Therefor, each node thinks it owns the quorum and is the primary node.&lt;BR /&gt;I don't exactly know which hardware failures are necessary to get this situation.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/netraid-4m-amp-mscs-quorum-raid/m-p/2632115#M1045</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Hogeveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-18T10:12:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

