<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors in Netservers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736431#M2572</link>
    <description>FULL INSTALL ? &lt;BR /&gt;ouch, I am assuming that will not effect whatever parameters that are already set in the kernel? I don't know what all makes up the mail portion of the kernel, but if a full install would keep the current character of the server intact, hardware devices etc then I could see doing a FULL INSTALL ! &lt;BR /&gt;seems drastic. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 18:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mike Willour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-06-03T18:41:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736429#M2570</link>
      <description>Every AM I check the root mail and check through scoadmin whether any links are broken. Several links are typically broken, IE sendmail, execmail, rmail, scomail, and mail. &lt;BR /&gt;I am thinking about reinstalling a portion of the ver 505 install, specifically the SCO sendmail portion. &lt;BR /&gt;Will there be any problem with deleting that section within scoadmin and then go into install mode and copy it in fresh from the installation CD. I haven't tried a "portion install" and I wouldn't want to delete that section first and then find myself in a worse position.&lt;BR /&gt;This AM /var/opt/K/SCO/SendMail/8.8.8b/spool/mail/root had 7562181 bytes, dated May 30, and /var/spool/mail/root had 211861 bytes, dated June 2,2002. After I fixed the links, both files had the 7562181 bytes dated May 30 and the current mail was deleted. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 14:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736429#M2570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Willour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-03T14:53:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736430#M2571</link>
      <description>Mike,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any time that you are looking to do either a partial install or a recovery type install it is normally recommended to do a fresh install of the NOS.  That being said with Sco and Linux there shouldn't be any issues with reinstalling those apps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ciao,&lt;BR /&gt;Greg</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 17:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736430#M2571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Carlson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-03T17:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736431#M2572</link>
      <description>FULL INSTALL ? &lt;BR /&gt;ouch, I am assuming that will not effect whatever parameters that are already set in the kernel? I don't know what all makes up the mail portion of the kernel, but if a full install would keep the current character of the server intact, hardware devices etc then I could see doing a FULL INSTALL ! &lt;BR /&gt;seems drastic. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 18:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736431#M2572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Willour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-03T18:41:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736432#M2573</link>
      <description>Mike,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check your crontab entries and make sure they aren't deleting "old" files (your links).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it time for linux?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 19:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736432#M2573</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-03T19:54:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCO Unix 5.0.5 sendmail errors</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736433#M2574</link>
      <description>So you're using Custom's little thingie to verify links..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Don't bother.  That thing has enough holes in it to sink ships.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If there are some obvious link problems, feel free to fix them manually.  In things like this one you've listed however, I wouldn't be concerned at all.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Befor eyou even consider reinstalling any portion of the SCO OS, you'll need to check which patches and supplements are currently installed:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;customquery listpaches | head -1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After you've done this, you need to roll back all of these that affect sendmail (RS505A, possibly a few of the SSE's if you've installed them too), and then remove/re-add sendmail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I advise against this.  There's probably nothing wrong with the Sendmail installation.  If you are happy enough with the way things look with the current broken-state of some of the links (beleive me, you should be.  You have to break a few of those links in order to satisfy/work around a few other minor issues!), then just re-generate custom's verification map.  (see 'man custom', and the '-w' flag).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Personally, I'd reccomend you just ignore those you can live with.  *looks at his mail* 14 currently broken on that system over there.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 22:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/sco-unix-5-0-5-sendmail-errors/m-p/2736433#M2574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stuart Browne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-03T22:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

