<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3 in Netservers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981772#M4785</link>
    <description>What are you using to test the through put of this array?  Are the drives on one channel of the controler or two?  How much cache is on the controler?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Joe Campbell</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Campbell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-06-10T12:04:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981769#M4782</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've made a new installation of Win2k Server on a Netserver LH3. It has 6 disks on the integrated NetRAID controller, 5 for a RAID 5 Array and 1 as Hot Spare. &lt;BR /&gt;My problem is that the performance of the RAID is absolutly poor. It writes with about 2-3Mb/sec and reads with about 6-7Mb/sec. I think it should be much faster. &lt;BR /&gt;The stripesize is set to 64k. Where is the problem (or is the performance OK for this kind of Array?)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 12:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981769#M4782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Walter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-26T12:05:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981770#M4783</link>
      <description>It could be that one of the drives had a problem. WHat are the drives? Size, age, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;Does one access light flash more than the others?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 11:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981770#M4783</guid>
      <dc:creator>e4services</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-27T11:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981771#M4784</link>
      <description>The drives are all from HP but manufactored by Seagate I think. The size of the drives is 9GB. I don't really know how old they are but the lights are flashing all very equally. &lt;BR /&gt;The NetRaid Diagtool sais, that all drives are ok...&lt;BR /&gt;What can I do?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 15:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981771#M4784</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florian Walter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-27T15:02:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981772#M4785</link>
      <description>What are you using to test the through put of this array?  Are the drives on one channel of the controler or two?  How much cache is on the controler?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Joe Campbell</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981772#M4785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-10T12:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981773#M4786</link>
      <description>the problem is that you're using a raid 5, if you want to have the best compromise, you must use a raid 0+1</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981773#M4786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Le Gouellec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-16T20:26:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with RAID on LH 3</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981774#M4787</link>
      <description>Are you sure the controller is set to Ultra-2?.&lt;BR /&gt;What is the NTFS allocation block size set to ?&lt;BR /&gt;I once spent a day experimenting with different&lt;BR /&gt;stripe size v block sizes, and found a combination that jumped the read rate from less than 10M/sec to 15.6M/sec. This was a raid 0 array, and not on a LH. &lt;BR /&gt;I found that for this particular server, a NTFS block size of 1/4 the stripe size  gave the best performance. &lt;BR /&gt;I'm sure that for a LH with Raid5 the ratio will probably be different, just play with the sizes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ian&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 08:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/netservers/problems-with-raid-on-lh-3/m-p/2981774#M4787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Wilson_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-23T08:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

