<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SQL in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476189#M1081</link>
    <description>Who does a bigger "Level 2 Cache" will influense my SQL7 performance ?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-12-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476189#M1081</link>
      <description>Who does a bigger "Level 2 Cache" will influense my SQL7 performance ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476189#M1081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476190#M1082</link>
      <description>The larger your level 2 cache is, the better your SQLy performance.  This is true, however, with any software.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476190#M1082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476191#M1083</link>
      <description>the size of your L2 cache only starts to really affect performance when you scale beyond a single processor, and then only when going to 4 and up. &lt;BR /&gt;A certain amount of cache is used to provide cache coherency between each processor. Good rule of thumb is if you are buying a box that supports 4 processors then you can afford 2MB cache processors coz thats the only way you will take full advantage of the potential offered by 4 processors. &lt;BR /&gt;SQL tuning requires a lot more than just cache ...... &lt;BR /&gt;physical memory x 3 for pagefile &lt;BR /&gt;seperate system, pagefile, transaction logs and db disks, NT tuning &lt;BR /&gt;etc etc etc &lt;BR /&gt;look it up, theres loads of data on tuning sql produced by compaq and MS</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476191#M1083</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476192#M1084</link>
      <description>See the Compaq Engineering white paper on configuring SQL 6.5 in an NT 4.0 OS environment on Compaq Proliant systems. Many of the items covered apply to SQL 6.5 and 7.0 versions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www5.compaq.com/support/techpubs/whitepapers/415a0696_2.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www5.compaq.com/support/techpubs/whitepapers/415a0696_2.html&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/sql/m-p/2476192#M1084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayman Altounji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

