https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/failed-smartarray-battery/m-p/5381977#M124732 The cache module itself could be bad. Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:34:49 GMT Torsten. 2011-11-04T13:34:49Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/failed-smartarray-battery/m-p/5381415#M124727 <P>ML350G4</P><P>Smart Array 642 Controller (firmware 2.84)</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Originally this machine had a Smart Array 641 controller and started generating failed battery message.&nbsp; Replaced battery.&nbsp; Message persisted.&nbsp; Replaced controller with a 642 (moved memory and battery from 641 controller).&nbsp; Message persists.&nbsp; What next?</P> Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:08:03 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/failed-smartarray-battery/m-p/5381415#M124727 rdwild 2011-11-04T02:08:03Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/failed-smartarray-battery/m-p/5381977#M124732 The cache module itself could be bad. Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:34:49 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/failed-smartarray-battery/m-p/5381977#M124732 Torsten. 2011-11-04T13:34:49Z