<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Potential problems using same spare part and PN memory modules of different chip manufacturers in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6952031#M156947</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; They have same Spare Part and P/N numbers...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If these are numbers from HP then the internal specs would be the same for all modules. I would use them without any concern.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TTr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-28T19:29:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Potential problems using same spare part and PN memory modules of different chip manufacturers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6950192#M156878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have four memory modules for my ProLiant DL20 Gen9: three of them made by SK/Hynix and one by Samsung (SEC). They have same Spare Part and P/N numbers wich are fits requirements written in QuickSpecs document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it ok to use them side by side or better to change SEC module to another one made by Hynix?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6950192#M156878</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrKovalex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-21T22:12:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Potential problems using same spare part and PN memory modules of different chip manufacturers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6952031#M156947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; They have same Spare Part and P/N numbers...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If these are numbers from HP then the internal specs would be the same for all modules. I would use them without any concern.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6952031#M156947</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T19:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Potential problems using same spare part and PN memory modules of different chip manufacturers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6952075#M156948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for answer!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/potential-problems-using-same-spare-part-and-pn-memory-modules/m-p/6952075#M156948</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrKovalex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T22:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

