<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Smart Array 5i Plus Controller and Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921498#M15953</link>
    <description>Although I do not know if this specific controller is "designed" for specific db use, Most descent controllers will allow you to set the write-through and write-back cache policies to suite your needs and comfort levels.  I am fairly certain this is true about the SA 5i controller too..</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob Bell_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-03-06T21:58:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Smart Array 5i Plus Controller and Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921497#M15952</link>
      <description>Does anyone know if the Smart Array 5i Plus Controller is specifically designed for use with databases? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;According to Microsoft you run the risk of database corruption if you use a write-caching disk controller that is not designed for databases.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is because SQL Server relies on the Windows OS to notify it when an I/O operation has completed. If anyone has any insight on this I would be very grateful.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921497#M15952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Hellyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T21:20:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Smart Array 5i Plus Controller and Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921498#M15953</link>
      <description>Although I do not know if this specific controller is "designed" for specific db use, Most descent controllers will allow you to set the write-through and write-back cache policies to suite your needs and comfort levels.  I am fairly certain this is true about the SA 5i controller too..</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921498#M15953</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob Bell_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T21:58:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Smart Array 5i Plus Controller and Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921499#M15954</link>
      <description>Just a note: it would be that the controller signals as a successful (i/o completion)  "write" to the cache or the disk that is difference in the write-back (cache) and write-through (disk)..</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921499#M15954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob Bell_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-06T22:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Smart Array 5i Plus Controller and Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921500#M15955</link>
      <description>I think you'll find that all of the HP/Compaq write-cacheing array controllers meet your requirements.  The only possible issue is that one thread of your DB writes to the DB - and the array controller caches it: if another thread now attempts to read the same record information, a well designed array controller will fulfill the request from the recently updated cache (which give the DB thread the latest, correct informtion).  A poorly designed array controller would supply information from HDD, and supply out-of-date information.  Such an array controller would rapidly become notorious, and stop selling.&lt;BR /&gt;I think you'll find that the Microsoft 'advice' is teaching granny to suck eggs.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/smart-array-5i-plus-controller-and-battery-backed-write-cache/m-p/2921500#M15955</guid>
      <dc:creator>Glenn Weavind_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-03-10T08:52:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

