<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proliant embedded 4-port NIC: redundancy best practice in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7030981#M165250</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm in search of expert advice regarding the usage of the port in the DL series embedded 4-Port NIC when bonding is used.&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to know if the 4 port are serviced by on single chip, 2 chips or 4 chips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I case the ports are services by 2 chips then the question would be how these are groupped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to maximize the redundancy configuration by making sure I use separate chips for each of the bonding slaves.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2019 10:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>seurat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-13T10:35:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proliant embedded 4-port NIC: redundancy best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7030981#M165250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm in search of expert advice regarding the usage of the port in the DL series embedded 4-Port NIC when bonding is used.&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to know if the 4 port are serviced by on single chip, 2 chips or 4 chips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I case the ports are services by 2 chips then the question would be how these are groupped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to maximize the redundancy configuration by making sure I use separate chips for each of the bonding slaves.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2019 10:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7030981#M165250</guid>
      <dc:creator>seurat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-13T10:35:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant embedded 4-port NIC: redundancy best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7030993#M165252</link>
      <description>Is this the Gen9/Gen10 DL360/DL380? If so, the embedded NIC is the 331i which is a single Broadcom NIC, basically an embedded version of the 331FLR and 331T.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2019 17:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7030993#M165252</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-13T17:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant embedded 4-port NIC: redundancy best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7032926#M165459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Kevin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see that the embedded NIC is powered by a single Broadcom chip. Therefore, it makes no difference which NIC ports one uses; if the chip breaks all are gone.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/proliant-embedded-4-port-nic-redundancy-best-practice/m-p/7032926#M165459</guid>
      <dc:creator>seurat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-30T15:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

