<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Server Throughput during backup in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202945#M25915</link>
    <description>Wasn't sure of the appropriate area to post this but..&lt;BR /&gt;I'm setting up a new backup environment based around NetBackup 4.5 and have been very disappointed with the general throughput I'm getting.&lt;BR /&gt;I have 2 DL80's G3, 1 as master attached to an StorageTek L700 with 2 LTO2 drives (FC) and 1 as media server attached to a Quantum DX30 (FC).&lt;BR /&gt;Using either a DL380G3 or a ML530G2 I seem unable to get any more than about 12MB/s from the client during backup.  The ML has 7 72GB drives (10k rpm) on a 5312 controller so in theory the Network should be the bottleneck - which is 'only' 1Gb.&lt;BR /&gt;I've tried bypassing the backup software by using FTP and get even worse throughput - arounf 9MB/s.  Even configuring a 1.5GB disk in RAM and backing that up only gave about 12MB/s too.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm running Windows 2000 SP4 throughout, but have tried Solaris 8 clients (and ftp) with similar results.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm sarting to wonder whether there is a limit either on the PCI bus (but PCI-X ought to be well quick) or the TCP stack....large packets has no effect though.&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of throughput does everyone else get?  Not so much artificial benchmarks, but real life file transfers (I use perfmon to determine throughput from/server).  I can't believe that Gb connectivity is only being 10-15% utilised per machine....I'd have hoped at least 30% and prefer 50% or so - am I so wrong?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-02-26T06:37:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202945#M25915</link>
      <description>Wasn't sure of the appropriate area to post this but..&lt;BR /&gt;I'm setting up a new backup environment based around NetBackup 4.5 and have been very disappointed with the general throughput I'm getting.&lt;BR /&gt;I have 2 DL80's G3, 1 as master attached to an StorageTek L700 with 2 LTO2 drives (FC) and 1 as media server attached to a Quantum DX30 (FC).&lt;BR /&gt;Using either a DL380G3 or a ML530G2 I seem unable to get any more than about 12MB/s from the client during backup.  The ML has 7 72GB drives (10k rpm) on a 5312 controller so in theory the Network should be the bottleneck - which is 'only' 1Gb.&lt;BR /&gt;I've tried bypassing the backup software by using FTP and get even worse throughput - arounf 9MB/s.  Even configuring a 1.5GB disk in RAM and backing that up only gave about 12MB/s too.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm running Windows 2000 SP4 throughout, but have tried Solaris 8 clients (and ftp) with similar results.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm sarting to wonder whether there is a limit either on the PCI bus (but PCI-X ought to be well quick) or the TCP stack....large packets has no effect though.&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of throughput does everyone else get?  Not so much artificial benchmarks, but real life file transfers (I use perfmon to determine throughput from/server).  I can't believe that Gb connectivity is only being 10-15% utilised per machine....I'd have hoped at least 30% and prefer 50% or so - am I so wrong?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dave</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202945#M25915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T06:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202946#M25916</link>
      <description>Quite no solution for the gigabit ethernet problem, but some tips for netbackup:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have a look after the statistics in the CPQTTAC (or whatever is the name beginning with HP now)applet in the status bar and you find transmit/receive underruns you could tune the registry parameter &lt;BR /&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Veritas\NetBackup\CurrentVersion\Config. The default is 32 (decimal). You could test 128 or even 256.&lt;BR /&gt;see:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.zedat.fu-berlin.de/services/fab/man/4.5/TuningNetbackupOnNT-4.5.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.zedat.fu-berlin.de/services/fab/man/4.5/TuningNetbackupOnNT-4.5.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240887.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240887.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Yes it is for 3.41 but ...)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Only a workaround for faster backup)&lt;BR /&gt;But aside from real network throughput the "client compression" feature of netbackup CAN really speed up backups (if you do not back up compressed data). &lt;BR /&gt;The only problem could be the relatively high CPU load on the client machine during backup.&lt;BR /&gt;(Policy attribute "compression" in jnbSA)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you tried to bypass your network infrastructure by using a crossover cable between two clients or client and server?&lt;BR /&gt;May be the switch and clients/server do not work together as expected.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202946#M25916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thilo Knoch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T08:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202947#M25917</link>
      <description>Check your cables.&lt;BR /&gt;Dont use auto-detect on your LAN card. Force the speed/duplex to your wanted value.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202947#M25917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Olivier Drouin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T08:49:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202948#M25918</link>
      <description>We recently had a similar problem; turned out to be a mismatch in bandwidth/duplex settings between the NICs and the switch. Set everything to 1000 full manually, and maybe you'll have better luck. Cheers, J</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202948#M25918</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Merrill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T14:58:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202949#M25919</link>
      <description>Dave, Check out the following link: &lt;A href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=lpg50460&amp;amp;locale=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=lpg50460&amp;amp;locale=en_US&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202949#M25919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colin_29</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-27T03:32:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202950#M25920</link>
      <description>I had a bit of a breakthrough in todays testing.&lt;BR /&gt;Firstly I tried bypassing the switch by using a cross over - now, this meant re-installing NetBackup as a master server on my media server since the 'proper' master is across a MAN link in a different building.&lt;BR /&gt;The throughput jumped to 20-30MB/s on a large file and around 13MB/s on small files - basically double what I had before.&lt;BR /&gt;Putting it back on the switch I the figures remained similar- so it seems to be related to the master server somehow....more tests to come (like try a different switch just to be sure) but I think I need to hassle Veritas now.&lt;BR /&gt;Having said that, it doesn't explain the poor FTP performance.&lt;BR /&gt;For the record, the NIC's are hard set to 1000 Full (can't do half on Gb anyway) and so are the switch ports.&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Dave</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202950#M25920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-27T06:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Server Throughput during backup</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202951#M25921</link>
      <description>Thanks for the link Colin.  I'd already tried those tools from that page prior to posting here.&lt;BR /&gt;My Dx30 virtual tape did 126MB/s&lt;BR /&gt;My LTO2 drive did 35MB/s at 2:1 compression and 90MB/s at 3:1.&lt;BR /&gt;The 'PAT' gave me varying figures but the main file server client was 9MB/s quick test, around 30MB/s full test and about 70MB/s sequential test.&lt;BR /&gt;My personal PC with a single IDE drive does 22MB/s, 17MB/s and 49MB/s for the same tests so i still believe that the RAID5 set is not operating as it should.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/server-throughput-during-backup/m-p/3202951#M25921</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-27T06:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

