<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pb hyperthreading in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368139#M34413</link>
    <description>top above is no correct !!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU0 states: 19,0% user,  7,4% system,  0,0% nice, 72,5% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU1 states: 14,3% user,  4,5% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU2 states: 17,2% user,  8,0% system,  0,0% nice, 74,2% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU3 states: 15,0% user,  3,4% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Pasquier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-08-30T09:51:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pb hyperthreading</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368138#M34412</link>
      <description>We have a Proliant server DL 360 with linux red hat (kernel 2.4.20) and I don't understand&lt;BR /&gt;why the second and the fourth 'virtual processor' are 0% of idle.Here is the result of the 'top' commande :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU0 states: 19,1% user, 11,3% system,  0,0%nice, 69,0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU1 states: 18,1% user,  3,3% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU2 states: 16,1% user,  9,2% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU3 states: 18,3% user,  4,2% system,  0,0% nice, 76,4% idle&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the server seem to work well!! and after a reboot the four processors are some idle.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;what is the problem ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks..</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368138#M34412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anthony Pasquier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-30T09:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pb hyperthreading</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368139#M34413</link>
      <description>top above is no correct !!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU0 states: 19,0% user,  7,4% system,  0,0% nice, 72,5% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU1 states: 14,3% user,  4,5% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU2 states: 17,2% user,  8,0% system,  0,0% nice, 74,2% idle&lt;BR /&gt;CPU3 states: 15,0% user,  3,4% system,  0,0% nice, 0% idle&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:51:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368139#M34413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anthony Pasquier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-30T09:51:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pb hyperthreading</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368140#M34414</link>
      <description>Hyper-Threading may be involved here and goofing up your affinity, but do a man on "taskset" and see if you can move your apps around.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;G'luck! -john</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/pb-hyperthreading/m-p/3368140#M34414</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnWRuffo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-30T13:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

