<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HP Smart Array E200 in ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355564#M87906</link>
    <description>Hiya&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking at getting one of these with the 128MB BWWC, but am confused by the interface speeds. It states it's 150MBps for SATA but 300MBps for SAS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That's not physically possible is it, as both types of drive plug into the same ports - there isn't seperate ports for SATA and SAS?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If it is the case, what sort of performance can I expect for a 4 drive RAID 5 array?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ldoodle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-10T11:08:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HP Smart Array E200</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355564#M87906</link>
      <description>Hiya&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking at getting one of these with the 128MB BWWC, but am confused by the interface speeds. It states it's 150MBps for SATA but 300MBps for SAS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That's not physically possible is it, as both types of drive plug into the same ports - there isn't seperate ports for SATA and SAS?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If it is the case, what sort of performance can I expect for a 4 drive RAID 5 array?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355564#M87906</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldoodle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T11:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HP Smart Array E200</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355565#M87907</link>
      <description>The speed difference is due to the difference in the drive technologies (SAS vs. SATA). Smart Array controllers are designed to provide a more robust feature set (Raid 5, hot plug functionality, LED's, etc.) than embedded soft raid controllers. For now, these controllers support 1.5 Gb transfers with SATA drives.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's difficult to say what kind of performance you would get with a 4 drive raid 5 without knowing what type of drives you'll be using.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355565#M87907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Terry Hutchings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T13:12:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HP Smart Array E200</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355566#M87908</link>
      <description>If it's down to the disk technology, if I used SATA-II drives I should get 3Gbps, as I would obviously used 3Gbps drives.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unless there are 2 seperate controllers on the card; SAS and SATA. If so, then I can understand the 1.5Gbps limitation, but if it's a single SAS/SATA chip, I don't see how it could work a 3Gbps for SAS but 1.5Gbps for SATA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would be using Seagate 'home-use' drives. This is only for a small home server machine.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/proliant-servers-ml-dl-sl/hp-smart-array-e200/m-p/4355566#M87908</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldoodle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T15:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

