<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: maximum switch connetion depth in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070296#M12467</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks for the clarification. the example i gave is an exangeration of how our network is setup. For the most part we are setup with a pretty good start topology. We have STP and VRRP running on two core switches and redundant fiber links to all buildings. I should have been more specific with the network layout that i'm being forced to consider. It would be more like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(core) -fiber&amp;gt; (2524) -copper eth&amp;gt; (new 2524)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i should mention this is scenario is purley a request from our phone guy who is trying to avoind running a bunch of wires a long distance. I think i'm just going to use a stacking kit and make the phone guy run the wires.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mike Tupker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-13T13:24:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>maximum switch connetion depth</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070294#M12465</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;I was wondering how many switches deep can one connect other switches using copper ethernet? For example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;core -&amp;gt; switchA -&amp;gt; switchB -&amp;gt; switchC -&amp;gt; etc...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know this is a pretty basic question but it's one of those questions I've never run across before. mainly i'm dealing with procurve 2524's in this scenario. Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070294#M12465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Tupker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-13T12:51:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: maximum switch connetion depth</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070295#M12466</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unless you are doing cascading OR you have dual links between the switches and spanning-Tree is running , you can have many connected like your (unrecommended) way.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are cascading, then the limitation is up to 15, and if Spanning tree is running, you can have up to 7 in one diameter (connection like your existing one).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some of the issues you will have is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Speed, and Bandwidth availability: if you are running routing on the core so SwitchA (poor guy) has to carry all the switches connected to his tail like a train.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Single point of failure: id SwitchA is gone, of at least the link between SwitchA and core is gone then bye bye.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Instead of that, you can have the Star topology by connecting each edge to core by single or multiple links.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And one of the scenarios is to have SwitchA connected to each Edge switch one to one, and from switchA one or more links to the core.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck !!!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070295#M12466</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-13T13:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: maximum switch connetion depth</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070296#M12467</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks for the clarification. the example i gave is an exangeration of how our network is setup. For the most part we are setup with a pretty good start topology. We have STP and VRRP running on two core switches and redundant fiber links to all buildings. I should have been more specific with the network layout that i'm being forced to consider. It would be more like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(core) -fiber&amp;gt; (2524) -copper eth&amp;gt; (new 2524)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i should mention this is scenario is purley a request from our phone guy who is trying to avoind running a bunch of wires a long distance. I think i'm just going to use a stacking kit and make the phone guy run the wires.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/maximum-switch-connetion-depth/m-p/4070296#M12467</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Tupker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-13T13:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

