<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: STP on procurve stk of 2524's in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156925#M13589</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks for the reply Matt,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have downloaded the ne Firmware and am going to install this weekend. I believe I will disable LACP as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again, B.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>B Vance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-07T16:30:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>STP on procurve stk of 2524's</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156923#M13587</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;I am just learning about STP and have a quick question:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have 9 2524's in a stack with no redundant links, is there a problem with RSTP enabled on all switches or is it even necessary? This is just a flat L2 switched net. with no VLANs.&lt;BR /&gt; Also, LACP is enabled as passive on all ports but there is no link aggregation, can this be disabled with no ill effects?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks, B.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156923#M13587</guid>
      <dc:creator>B Vance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-06T22:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: STP on procurve stk of 2524's</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156924#M13588</link>
      <description>It's probably a good idea to leave RSTP enabled just in case a loop is inadvertently created. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd also make sure you're running the latest firmware (F.05.61) for the numerous bug fixes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If LACP is not causing a problem, you can leave it enabled. A lot of people do prefer to disable it though as some operating systems can be sensitive to the slight 3 second delay it takes for the switch to start forwarding traffic after the port comes online.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With the current products, LACP is now disabled by default.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156924#M13588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Hobbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-06T23:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: STP on procurve stk of 2524's</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156925#M13589</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Thanks for the reply Matt,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have downloaded the ne Firmware and am going to install this weekend. I believe I will disable LACP as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again, B.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/stp-on-procurve-stk-of-2524-s/m-p/4156925#M13589</guid>
      <dc:creator>B Vance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-07T16:30:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

