<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: switch clustering using stacking feature in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238234#M14982</link>
    <description>Sorry for the mess in the drawing, i hope now it will be ok :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          Proliant Server&lt;BR /&gt;            /          \&lt;BR /&gt;           /            \&lt;BR /&gt;          /              \&lt;BR /&gt;         /                \ &lt;BR /&gt;     3400clA ----------- 3400clB&lt;BR /&gt;     Switch  ----------- Switch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck !!!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:35:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238231#M14979</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;does only the procurve's chassis solution (5400zl series, 5300xl servies and the 4200vl series) provide the "extended" stacking features such as creating a switch cluster or also other switches like the 3400cl series?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;my problem is the following: &lt;BR /&gt;i have several proliant servers, 2 procurve 3400cl switches and 6 procurve 2650 switches. all my proliant network cards are in a team (i used the hp teaming software) using the TLB (transmit load balancing) mode. each server is connected with 1 nic on switch(3400cl)A and the other nic on switch(3400)B. between the 2 switches i created a mesh-domain.&lt;BR /&gt;TLB provides  switch redundancy but only 1 nic is used for incoming traffic from the network and all nic's for transmitting traffic. i searched for a solution for a full load balancing with switch redundancy and found the "dual channel (dynamic) load balancing mode" available by using the so called INP license by hp....BUT this mode is no longer supported and available by HP...!&lt;BR /&gt;my idea was then to enable stacking on the 2 procurve3400cl switches not only to obtain the "virtual" managability but to obtain a cluster between this 2 switches in order to connect the 2 server nic's using TRUNKING mode (1 nic on 1 physical 3400 switch and the other nic on the other physical switch). &lt;BR /&gt;i'll be able to create this topology only with a switch that has the feature to create a cluster with another switch and where i can make a trunk over 2 ports on different switches in my cluster-switch-group.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is this possible or does somebody know's an alternative solution for my problem?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks....&lt;BR /&gt;jürgen</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238231#M14979</guid>
      <dc:creator>zwerger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T08:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238232#M14980</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;            PROLIANTSRV&lt;BR /&gt;            /         \&lt;BR /&gt;           /           \&lt;BR /&gt;          /             \&lt;BR /&gt;         /               \&lt;BR /&gt;     3400clA           3400clB</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238232#M14980</guid>
      <dc:creator>zwerger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T09:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238233#M14981</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just connect one NIC to first 3400, and second NIC to  second 3400, and create a Trunk of 2 Links at least between both 3400 like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          Proliant Server&lt;BR /&gt;            /         \&lt;BR /&gt;           /           \&lt;BR /&gt;          /             \&lt;BR /&gt;         /               \&lt;BR /&gt;     3400clA ----------- 3400clB&lt;BR /&gt;     Switch  ----------- Switch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck !!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238233#M14981</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:33:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238234#M14982</link>
      <description>Sorry for the mess in the drawing, i hope now it will be ok :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          Proliant Server&lt;BR /&gt;            /          \&lt;BR /&gt;           /            \&lt;BR /&gt;          /              \&lt;BR /&gt;         /                \ &lt;BR /&gt;     3400clA ----------- 3400clB&lt;BR /&gt;     Switch  ----------- Switch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck !!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238234#M14982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:35:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238235#M14983</link>
      <description>Again messed :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check attachment</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:37:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238235#M14983</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:37:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238236#M14984</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for your reply,&lt;BR /&gt;hm....you mean that instead of using meshing between the 2 3400cl switches i have to use a simple TRUNK (using 2 ports)?&lt;BR /&gt;and on the ports where my proliant server is connected i have to use LACP and on the server i set the bonding mode to use also LACP?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;jÃ¼rgen</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238236#M14984</guid>
      <dc:creator>zwerger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T11:40:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238237#M14985</link>
      <description>As far as I know HP does not *yet* allow you to really cluster the switches like cisco and nortel do. Clustered HP's are only for the management point of view (easy to manage). Cisco and Nortel do allow you to cluster and see the two switches as one real switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From inside information I understand that new firmware which will come out within a few month will allow trunking over multiple switches. But I don't know more about it or how it works.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238237#M14985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Igor Ybema</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-25T14:11:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: switch clustering using stacking feature</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238238#M14986</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just make a Trunk of at least 2 ports between the 3400s.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And leave the Ports on the Switch on default : Auto.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck !!!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/switch-clustering-using-stacking-feature/m-p/4238238#M14986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-25T15:11:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

