<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic why does my subnet have four invalid IP address? in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358117#M17432</link>
    <description>I have Procurve 2650 to enable arp proxy. There are two vlans. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The default vlan #1 has network: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.0.0/24 (IP range used:  192.168.0.0~192.168.0.127 and 192.168.0.192~192.168.0.255)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the other vlan #2 is a subnet: 192.168.0.128/26 with IP range: 192.168.0.128~192.168.0.191. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem comes from vlan #2. In addition to the 192.168.0.128 as the network and 192.168.0.191 as the broadcast address, i found I can NOT use the 192.168.0.129 and 192.168.0.190 addresses either! &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, when I set a host in VLAN #2 with IP=192.168.0.129, I can't ping this host from the switch. But when i changed that host's IP to 192.168.0.130, the ping works. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So why can't the subnet 192.168.0.128/26 use the address 192.168.0.129 and 192.168.0.190 as host address?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ljshan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-13T10:17:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why does my subnet have four invalid IP address?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358117#M17432</link>
      <description>I have Procurve 2650 to enable arp proxy. There are two vlans. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The default vlan #1 has network: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;192.168.0.0/24 (IP range used:  192.168.0.0~192.168.0.127 and 192.168.0.192~192.168.0.255)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the other vlan #2 is a subnet: 192.168.0.128/26 with IP range: 192.168.0.128~192.168.0.191. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem comes from vlan #2. In addition to the 192.168.0.128 as the network and 192.168.0.191 as the broadcast address, i found I can NOT use the 192.168.0.129 and 192.168.0.190 addresses either! &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, when I set a host in VLAN #2 with IP=192.168.0.129, I can't ping this host from the switch. But when i changed that host's IP to 192.168.0.130, the ping works. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So why can't the subnet 192.168.0.128/26 use the address 192.168.0.129 and 192.168.0.190 as host address?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358117#M17432</guid>
      <dc:creator>ljshan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-13T10:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why does my subnet have four invalid IP address?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358118#M17433</link>
      <description>If you haven't mistaken the CIDR blocks when writing, both VLAN share the same IP space.&lt;BR /&gt;In VLAN#1, 192.168.0.0/24 means that the network address is 192.168.0.0, the broadcast address is 192.168.0.255 and all in between are IP addresses available for hosts.&lt;BR /&gt;VLAN#2 uses the same address space, as 192.168.0.[128-191] is included in VLAN#1.&lt;BR /&gt;I suppose the switch is becoming confused with that.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358118#M17433</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jorge Pinto Leite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-14T09:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why does my subnet have four invalid IP address?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358119#M17434</link>
      <description>Jorge points out "both VLAN share the same IP space"&lt;BR /&gt;What Jorge means is both subnets overlap!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is a difference between an ip number range and an ip-subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Although you only use 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.127 and 192.168.0.192 -192.168.0.255, the subnet 192.168.0.0/24 spans the whole range from .0 to .255&lt;BR /&gt;So the adresses in subnet/vlan2 fall within the same subnet as vlan-1.&lt;BR /&gt;You'd better use 192.168.0.0/24 for vlan1 and 192.168.1.0/26 for vlan2 (or 192.168.1.128/26 if you want)&lt;BR /&gt;thus the subnets have no overlap&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/why-does-my-subnet-have-four-invalid-ip-address/m-p/4358119#M17434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-16T14:35:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

