<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399552#M18217</link>
    <description>basically it must work.&lt;BR /&gt;you have two routers that need to route between them.&lt;BR /&gt;That each router has a backup-router that uses a different technique to determine the status of the active rotuer makes no difference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the function of HSRP or VRRP is to have multiple devices "share" a single router adress, where one of these devices is active and the others only monitor the status of this primary adress.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As long as both cisco's share hsrp and both hp's share vrrp, I don't think you will encounter any problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the main difference is&lt;BR /&gt;- for vrrp each device has it's own adress one device is "master", the other "slave", so you only need two addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;- for hsrp each device has it's own adress, and the share a third address, each device can be equally important for servicing this third address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Pieter</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:16:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399551#M18216</link>
      <description>hi , i would like to ask for some advice about the network that i'm trying to setup.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;here's how the design of my network looks like &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2 cisco 1841 connected to 2 ISP , for redundant connection to the internet (using HSRP of cisco).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;then 2 hp procurve 5400 to be connected to the two cisco 1841 also for redundancy purpose (using xrrp of hp)...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;so will this network setup work ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;please help me with this one, this is the network that we like to implement because of budget concern...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i've attached a picture of this network diagram&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399551#M18216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Lanuzga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-13T05:51:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399552#M18217</link>
      <description>basically it must work.&lt;BR /&gt;you have two routers that need to route between them.&lt;BR /&gt;That each router has a backup-router that uses a different technique to determine the status of the active rotuer makes no difference.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the function of HSRP or VRRP is to have multiple devices "share" a single router adress, where one of these devices is active and the others only monitor the status of this primary adress.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As long as both cisco's share hsrp and both hp's share vrrp, I don't think you will encounter any problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the main difference is&lt;BR /&gt;- for vrrp each device has it's own adress one device is "master", the other "slave", so you only need two addresses.&lt;BR /&gt;- for hsrp each device has it's own adress, and the share a third address, each device can be equally important for servicing this third address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Pieter</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399552#M18217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:16:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399553#M18218</link>
      <description>thanks for the reply ,,, i just want to clarify something ... i will be running XRRP (propriety of HP) for the two 5400. will this create conflict on my network ? because on my 1841 routers , i'll be using HSRP for redundant connection to the internet. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks again for future replies</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399553#M18218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Lanuzga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:26:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399554#M18219</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;i don't think this will be a problem, but i think the 5400zl just support vrrp and no xrrp. and only with the extra license.&lt;BR /&gt;but i don't understand why you want hsrp at the cisco's and vrrp at the hp's? &lt;BR /&gt;hth&lt;BR /&gt;alex&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399554#M18219</guid>
      <dc:creator>serpel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399555#M18220</link>
      <description>Hello Jonathan,&lt;BR /&gt;for the 5400's goes the same.&lt;BR /&gt;it's just a means to communicate between two otherwise equal devices, so they can determine who is "owner" of the router-address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;again as long as (for the same router address) you do not mix between two devices using different methods, the rest of the network will not know the difference.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:36:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399555#M18220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:36:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399556#M18221</link>
      <description>thanks for the replies ... but actually i want to ask if how , in your opinion this network should be designed ... i want to implement redundancy for internet connection and connection to my HP 5400 switches . i won't be able to use vrrp because of budget concerns, due to additional licensing cost .. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;again thank's for future replies</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399556#M18221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Lanuzga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T08:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399557#M18222</link>
      <description>for your internal network it's no problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You'll use the 5400's as your local network router. Your local network sees a single router. That they use xrrp to create redundance between them for routing is no problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Youll use the 1841's as internet router&lt;BR /&gt;her also from the 5400 you see a single router, that these use HSRP to create a redundant router address is no problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But your problem will be at the ISP-side.&lt;BR /&gt;Each ISP will have it's own public address-range from wich you get a subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It will be difficult to make public-adress-1 from ISP-1 reachable through the connection of ISP-2.&lt;BR /&gt;That you'll have to negotiate with both ISP's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I assume your budget will not be enough to acquire an ISP-independant public range and have routing be setup using BGP at the public-internet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pieter</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399557#M18222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-14T09:15:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compatibility question about hsrp, vrrp and xrrp</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399558#M18223</link>
      <description>thank you very much ,,, yeah , i forgot to consider the public address that i should have for this network to make hsrp work... But again, thanks for the help...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:48:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/compatibility-question-about-hsrp-vrrp-and-xrrp/m-p/4399558#M18223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan Lanuzga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-15T03:48:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

