<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VRRP active/active? in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594548#M21684</link>
    <description>Thanks for your responses. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In regards to Jeff's comments can I have all VLAN(s) on both switches and the switches decide to load balance traffic from the access layer switches&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't like having one switch handle half the network and the other switch handle the other. I want both switches to handle the entire network and load balance traffic. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That way if one switch does go down half the network doesn't go down and one switch is responsible for all the routing. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Graham</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>groque</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-04T17:46:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VRRP active/active?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594545#M21681</link>
      <description>Hi all, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just wondering is it possible to configure a VRRP active/active scenario. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have done this with HSRP by deploying 2 groups and it worked fine group 1 Active Passive group 2 Passive Active. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am wondering if this is possible with the HP VRRP side of things. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:37:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594545#M21681</guid>
      <dc:creator>groque</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-03T23:37:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP active/active?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594546#M21682</link>
      <description>Basically yes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can have router1 being active for say 1/2 of your networks (vlans) and router2 be on backup state, and then have router2 be active for other 1/2 of networks(vlans) and router1 be in backup state.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VRRP is the IETF standards based router redundancy protocol and operates similar to HSRP (Cisco proprietary).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth...Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594546#M21682</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T14:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP active/active?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594547#M21683</link>
      <description>Hi Groque&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Exactly the same concept woudl apply. You might want to look at MSTP then as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594547#M21683</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gerhard Roets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T17:06:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP active/active?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594548#M21684</link>
      <description>Thanks for your responses. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In regards to Jeff's comments can I have all VLAN(s) on both switches and the switches decide to load balance traffic from the access layer switches&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't like having one switch handle half the network and the other switch handle the other. I want both switches to handle the entire network and load balance traffic. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That way if one switch does go down half the network doesn't go down and one switch is responsible for all the routing. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Graham</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594548#M21684</guid>
      <dc:creator>groque</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T17:46:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP active/active?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594549#M21685</link>
      <description>groque said:&lt;BR /&gt;In regards to Jeff's comments can I have all VLAN(s) on both switches and the switches decide to load balance traffic from the access layer switches&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't like having one switch handle half the network and the other switch handle the other. I want both switches to handle the entire network and load balance traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That way if one switch does go down half the network doesn't go down and one switch is responsible for all the routing.&lt;BR /&gt;---&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VRRP does not have the GLBP that HSRP does, so no you cannot run VRRP the way you describe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP has added a few extra's to VRRP support, check out their latest relnotes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth...Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-active-active/m-p/4594549#M21685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T18:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

