<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic loop protection and spanning tree in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662003#M23161</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The college network I administer has mostly old 8000 and 4000m switches with some 2500 series and a couple of 4108gl's and 2848's. We don't have redundant paths but we have had occasional problems with loops from somebody plugging a cable into two wall ports on one of the newer switches or putting their own cheap switch in and/or creating a loop with wireless devices. So, I put spanning tree on and left it in it's default configuration aside from set a low priority on root. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But that didn't do exactly what I wanted because we still ended up with the occasional loop when something became a step or two abstracted from spanning tree and it slowed the initial network connectivity down to nearly a minute bringing all kinds of complaints. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So being that none of these switches seem to have a setting for just inadvertent loop protection I'm trying to figure out the best way to stop inadvertent loops. Any suggestions?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnnyb_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-15T15:23:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>loop protection and spanning tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662003#M23161</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The college network I administer has mostly old 8000 and 4000m switches with some 2500 series and a couple of 4108gl's and 2848's. We don't have redundant paths but we have had occasional problems with loops from somebody plugging a cable into two wall ports on one of the newer switches or putting their own cheap switch in and/or creating a loop with wireless devices. So, I put spanning tree on and left it in it's default configuration aside from set a low priority on root. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But that didn't do exactly what I wanted because we still ended up with the occasional loop when something became a step or two abstracted from spanning tree and it slowed the initial network connectivity down to nearly a minute bringing all kinds of complaints. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So being that none of these switches seem to have a setting for just inadvertent loop protection I'm trying to figure out the best way to stop inadvertent loops. Any suggestions?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662003#M23161</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnnyb_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-15T15:23:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loop protection and spanning tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662004#M23162</link>
      <description>There is a feature called loop protection that is designed to cover situations where there are unmanaged areas of the network that don't support spanning tree.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure which series of swtiches/firmware it is available on but the manual section is under the MSTP chapter here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-ATG-Mar10-4-MSTP.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-ATG-Mar10-4-MSTP.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Other than that one thing you can do to reduce the chance of getting loops is to disable auto-mdix on those switches that you are having trouble with. That way someone would have to connect a crossover cable between two ports to create a loop.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662004#M23162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Faiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-16T09:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loop protection and spanning tree</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662005#M23163</link>
      <description>As Faiz mentioned, loop-protection is one feature which you could use to control the loops formed by introducing unmanaged (non STP capable)switches resulting in STP packets being dropped.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another way to solidify your STP deployment would be to use the feature called "BPDU protection" (this feature is supported in 2510's, 2520's, 2810's as well)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BPDU protection would ensure that spanning-tree BPDU's received from ports where end-nodes(workstations, laptop's, printers etc )are connected, are prevented from entering the STP domain.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;This would meet your case where someone plug's in their own switch to the workstation port and starts pumping in STP packets resulting in loops in your college network.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Turning on BPDU protection would disable the notorious port for a given (configurable) period. It can be enabled using the command &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#spanning-tree &lt;PORTS&gt; bpdu-protection&lt;BR /&gt;#spanning-tree bpdu-protection-timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Javed&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ps:- Noticed that you have joined recently and hence thought will share an important etiquette followed in the forum - assign points on scale (1-10) to people trying to help by answering your queries; its an appreciation for the time they spend in responding to your questions.&lt;/PORTS&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:55:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/loop-protection-and-spanning-tree/m-p/4662005#M23163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Javed Padinhakara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-17T01:55:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

