<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic trunking in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688950#M23882</link>
    <description>hi i ha2 10 swithes hp:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2 core 2848 &lt;BR /&gt;6 2624 &lt;BR /&gt;1 1810 g&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have a san iscsi so i set 2 core swithes with 4 inters-link trunked for the vlan default 1 and iscsi 130 (no stacking) .But i set also each switch to user, printer, workstation  with 1 trunked link LACP (2 port) , 1 link to each core swithes  and i see that i have no problem of loops without stp enable in my net.WHY this??i have loop if i split the 2 ports in 2 trunks , so 1 to 1 trk .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;how can i set for redundancy (1 core go down)to all other swithes ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is this fine without stp enabled??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stexlollo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-20T15:58:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688950#M23882</link>
      <description>hi i ha2 10 swithes hp:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2 core 2848 &lt;BR /&gt;6 2624 &lt;BR /&gt;1 1810 g&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have a san iscsi so i set 2 core swithes with 4 inters-link trunked for the vlan default 1 and iscsi 130 (no stacking) .But i set also each switch to user, printer, workstation  with 1 trunked link LACP (2 port) , 1 link to each core swithes  and i see that i have no problem of loops without stp enable in my net.WHY this??i have loop if i split the 2 ports in 2 trunks , so 1 to 1 trk .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;how can i set for redundancy (1 core go down)to all other swithes ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is this fine without stp enabled??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688950#M23882</guid>
      <dc:creator>stexlollo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-20T15:58:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688951#M23883</link>
      <description>hi i try with less, no answer i see:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i reed manuale and guide, no example of this situation. if i have 2 core swithes 2848 with 4 inter-links trunk and i want to link each to other edge switch like 2624 poe and not, HOW can do that if i want core swithc failure redundant and no STP enable.&lt;BR /&gt;last firmware.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i 'm testing  with 2 ports LACP from a 2624 to 2 trk each core switch 2848, i have no loop but i do not know if is the fine setting&lt;BR /&gt;??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;some help please...sorry for english</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688951#M23883</guid>
      <dc:creator>stexlollo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T05:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688952#M23884</link>
      <description>a trunk of multiple ports behave as a single link to spanning-tree, so no loop occurs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;whan you connect the two ports of this trunk that worked fine on a single switch&lt;BR /&gt;to two  different core-switches, a LACP-trunk is NOT is not allways formed/supported.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;look in the specs of your 2848  for "distributed trunking".&lt;BR /&gt;I don't thik is is supported on this model.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-MCG-Mar10-12-PortTrunk.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-MCG-Mar10-12-PortTrunk.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From the filename of this document : switches that do support this are 3500-5400-6200-6600-8200.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;so:&lt;BR /&gt;You probably cannot configure the desired redundancy without using spanning-tree.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688952#M23884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T06:27:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688953#M23885</link>
      <description>thanks , i saw and tested, no stp in all switch, with my 2 2848 that situation:i tested also a 4 ports trk(1810 trk to the two 2848 2+2 trunks ) and i see no collision and no loop.&lt;BR /&gt;if i unplug 1 links between the 1 core and the edge switch i see only 1 ping lose, if i unplug the last link , i see 3-4 ping lose but after the packets flow correctly trought the other switch core (also trought 4 interlink  trunk 1 to 1 between cores)&lt;BR /&gt;So for that reason , my ask was WHY also if i suppose i do note have distribuited lacp links???&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i note also a bug in trunking of the HP ProCurve 1810G - 24 GE, P.1.17, eCos-2.0&lt;BR /&gt;i create a vlan , i create a lacp trk with partecipating ports, after that if i change vlan ports setting , i must re-set lacp and trk setting, beacuse changes itself.&lt;BR /&gt;many hours before my trk with tag vlan was ok in this switch.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/trunking/m-p/4688953#M23885</guid>
      <dc:creator>stexlollo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-22T15:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

