<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600). in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734798#M24945</link>
    <description>Let me add a bit of clarification.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes the 3500/6600 can do OSPF, VRRP, Multicast Routing, IPv6 Routing and QinQ -but- they require a "premium license" to be purchased separately.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sorry I didn't say that previously.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They will do local routing, RIP and layer2 out of the cardboard box, it's just the higher level routing features require the add-on license.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;btw, the licenses are platform/product specific. This is sometimes an issue when folks have a 5400/8200 and see a less expensive license, but then find out it doesn't work. The licenses are priced based on platform (fixed port -vs- chassis).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth...Jeff</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-06T15:45:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734796#M24943</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A simple question really:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What's the primary differences between the E6600, E3500 and E2910 series?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking to purchase a replacement switch with 10GbE capabilities (and other port quantity requirements) and my research so far has led me towards the following 3 switches/configurations:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- HP E2910-24G al Switch (J9145A) with 2Port 10-GbE SFP+ (J9008A) installed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- HP E3500-24G-PoE+ yl Switch (J9310A) with 10-GbE 2Port SFP+/2 Port CX4 (J9312A) module installed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- HP E6600-24G-4XG Switch (J9264A)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Excluding the SFP+ transceivers, the cost differences between is three configurations above is quite noticable, especially between the E2910 and the E6600 series.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, does anybody know the benefit of the paying the extra cost. I've looked through the specifications of these switches and it seems to me the main difference is the Memory/Processor setup - as well as the routing table size. But which is best? What affect does a smaller routing table actually result in?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help answering my questions much appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Andrew</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734796#M24943</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Granville</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T14:18:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734797#M24944</link>
      <description>3500/6600 are full Layer 3 switches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The 2910 can do local routing and maybe RIP, but no OSPF or VRRP or IPv6 Routing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Layer 2 features will be basically the same across the all 3.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How much routing you do (either locally or out) may depend on which will work best.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the switch is a "core" or "server" switch, more capability for future use may be the better choice. Spend more now and have growth for later.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth...Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734797#M24944</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T15:21:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734798#M24945</link>
      <description>Let me add a bit of clarification.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes the 3500/6600 can do OSPF, VRRP, Multicast Routing, IPv6 Routing and QinQ -but- they require a "premium license" to be purchased separately.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sorry I didn't say that previously.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They will do local routing, RIP and layer2 out of the cardboard box, it's just the higher level routing features require the add-on license.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;btw, the licenses are platform/product specific. This is sometimes an issue when folks have a 5400/8200 and see a less expensive license, but then find out it doesn't work. The licenses are priced based on platform (fixed port -vs- chassis).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth...Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734798#M24945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T15:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734799#M24946</link>
      <description>Thanks for your replies.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The setup here is school based. The network has one subnet on one (default) VLAN. Routing out is controlled by an ISP/authority provided CISCO router or which I have no control over. This router is connected to a 5308xl, which in turn is connected by one path or another to approx. 50 Procurve 2500/2600 series.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The issue i've got is that the 5308xl is physically full. The 2910al appears to offer all the ports I require as a replacement as some 10GbE links are required, but I'm unsure as to how it would perform against the 5308xl. This is how i came to look at the 3500 and 6600 series, but the cost start to become astronomical (in our terms) when I priced them.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:06:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734799#M24946</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Granville</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T16:06:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734800#M24947</link>
      <description>Andrew asked": "how it would perform against the 5308xl."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have not looked at the specs of the 2910, but since it is based on much newer ASICs than the 5300, I would expect that they would be equal at least. The 2910 may even be a bit faster than the 5300.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know for sure the 3500/6600 would way out perform the 5300.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers...Jeff&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734800#M24947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Carrell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T16:17:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E Series Switch Differences (E2910/E3500/E6600).</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734801#M24948</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think that in your situation 2910al could be a good solution but not if that switch will become the core switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your description deal with about 50 access-switchs and 2910al is also an access-switch or little server farm one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The interoperability with a 5300 switch is not a problem.&lt;BR /&gt;But 2910al integrate recent features not available with old procurve switchs which you can't be able to use.&lt;BR /&gt;The best choice should be a 3500 or 5400 procurve switchs to replace your 5300 core network switch. and put it to the edge access like 2500/2600 devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Euro price from october 2010&lt;BR /&gt;HP E2910-24G al Switch - 1999â ¬&lt;BR /&gt;HP E3500-24G-PoE+ yl Switch - 3809â ¬&lt;BR /&gt;HP E5406-48G zl Switch - 7589â ¬ (+ HP 4-port 10GbE SFP+ zl Module - 3809â ¬)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's only my opinion.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bye.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/e-series-switch-differences-e2910-e3500-e6600/m-p/4734801#M24948</guid>
      <dc:creator>Helper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-06T16:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

