<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mesh design question in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/mesh-design-question/m-p/4792110#M26066</link>
    <description>I'm trying to design a mesh network for our existing LAN. The core switch is a 5406zl feeding to 6 5308xl switches. The mesh is going to be a partially connected one, and all I'm looking to do is provide at least 1 redundant path for each 5308 switch. I'd rather the traffic was balanced using a mesh, than only active on failure if using STP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, my question is, all the 5308's currently have primary fibre connections to the 5406. If I add a mesh, do all the switches need secondary (mesh port) connections to the 5406, or can I just configure the mesh between ports on the 5308's? It's a bit difficult to explain, but if a packet takes a meshed port route via another 5308, will the packet then expect to pass across a meshed port link back to the 5406, or can it use the primary connection that's already in place?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My concern is that if I don't have a meshed link (as well as a primary link) from each 5308 to the 5406, then packets could just spin round the meshed loop on the 5308's, and never make it back to the core.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tony Barrett_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-25T15:09:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mesh design question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/mesh-design-question/m-p/4792110#M26066</link>
      <description>I'm trying to design a mesh network for our existing LAN. The core switch is a 5406zl feeding to 6 5308xl switches. The mesh is going to be a partially connected one, and all I'm looking to do is provide at least 1 redundant path for each 5308 switch. I'd rather the traffic was balanced using a mesh, than only active on failure if using STP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, my question is, all the 5308's currently have primary fibre connections to the 5406. If I add a mesh, do all the switches need secondary (mesh port) connections to the 5406, or can I just configure the mesh between ports on the 5308's? It's a bit difficult to explain, but if a packet takes a meshed port route via another 5308, will the packet then expect to pass across a meshed port link back to the 5406, or can it use the primary connection that's already in place?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My concern is that if I don't have a meshed link (as well as a primary link) from each 5308 to the 5406, then packets could just spin round the meshed loop on the 5308's, and never make it back to the core.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/mesh-design-question/m-p/4792110#M26066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tony Barrett_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-25T15:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

