<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198029#M29075</link>
    <description>thanks for this info, Mohammed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Pieter</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-10T07:18:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198023#M29069</link>
      <description>Hi all.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have two 3500yl. VRRP and MSTP will be activated on both of them. A trunk will be created between them and all the VLANs will be tag on that trunk.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On multinetted servers (two nics), if I plug one nic to a switch and the another nic to the second switch, will I still have the same performance of my network teaming on the server? Does this configuration enables a redundant access to this server?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your help.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198023#M29069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yan Henrichon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-08T19:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198024#M29070</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; multinetted servers (two nics), &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;terminology:&lt;BR /&gt;multinet is commonly used on divices using multiple subnets on the same (v)lan, not for multiple network adapters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;back to the question:&lt;BR /&gt;most likely won't have the same performance!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when the NIC's are connected to the same switch you can configure this link as load balanncing etherchannel so both ports can be used simultanuously.&lt;BR /&gt;if your you NIC's are teamed, and connected to different switches, the team is fault-tolerant only (failover)!&lt;BR /&gt;only one NIC is active at a time for all traffic, no load balancing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198024#M29070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T06:04:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198025#M29071</link>
      <description>Pieter, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for you answer. I was wrong about multinetted server. I meant multihomed :).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:41:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198025#M29071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yan Henrichon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T12:41:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198026#M29072</link>
      <description>Pieter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For the loadbalancing etherchannel, I never seen this kind of configuration on the switch. Do I have to do it on the server side or switch side?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198026#M29072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yan Henrichon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T12:44:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198027#M29073</link>
      <description>Load balancing etherchannel must be done at both sides of the link.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;from management and config guide page 12-27:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The two trunk group options (LACP and Trunk) use source-destination address pairs (SA/DA) for distributing outbound traffic over trunked links.&lt;BR /&gt;SA/DA (source address/destination address) causes the switch to distribute&lt;BR /&gt;outbound traffic to the links within the trunk group on the basis of source/&lt;BR /&gt;destination address pairs.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If your server is Proliant, you can set the team config to "auto" (maybe other brands offer such option too).&lt;BR /&gt;as the switch supports IEEE 802.3ad (LACP) and both nics are connected to the same switch, the team will form automatically.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I associate multihomed with multiple NIC's each in it's own subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;A network team acts as a single NIC with a single subnet (unless you make it vlan-aware).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198027#M29073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T13:08:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198028#M29074</link>
      <description>You might also want to consider Distibuted Trunking (supported on K.14 code) which should allow you to load-balance across links to different switches.&lt;BR /&gt;Check out the manual pages here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-MCG-Sept09-12-PortTrunk.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://cdn.procurve.com/training/Manuals/3500-5400-6200-6600-8200-MCG-Sept09-12-PortTrunk.pdf&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198028#M29074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Faiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T14:22:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198029#M29075</link>
      <description>thanks for this info, Mohammed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Pieter</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198029#M29075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T07:18:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP, MSTP and multinetted server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198030#M29076</link>
      <description>Thank you everyone for your comments.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yan.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/vrrp-mstp-and-multinetted-server/m-p/5198030#M29076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yan Henrichon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T11:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

