<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The best way to implement switch redundancy in routed VLAN environment in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/the-best-way-to-implement-switch-redundancy-in-routed-vlan/m-p/3520699#M4894</link>
    <description>We have 2 core switches HP9304. Redundancy is implemented via SRP between HP9304. Servers are connected to core switches via a pair of HP5304 switches. Some servers are connected to 1 HP5304, another to 2 HP5304. As I can see HP5304 is a single point of failure. Now HP5304 works as a layer 2 switch. We want to use HP5304 as a layer 3 switch. &lt;BR /&gt;May we do such thing as:&lt;BR /&gt;-servers are connected to both HP5304. &lt;BR /&gt;-HP5304 implements redundancy with XRRP&lt;BR /&gt;-each HP5304 is connected to both HP9304&lt;BR /&gt;-HP9304 implements redundancy with SRP ?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maxim_18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-08T03:21:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The best way to implement switch redundancy in routed VLAN environment</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/the-best-way-to-implement-switch-redundancy-in-routed-vlan/m-p/3520699#M4894</link>
      <description>We have 2 core switches HP9304. Redundancy is implemented via SRP between HP9304. Servers are connected to core switches via a pair of HP5304 switches. Some servers are connected to 1 HP5304, another to 2 HP5304. As I can see HP5304 is a single point of failure. Now HP5304 works as a layer 2 switch. We want to use HP5304 as a layer 3 switch. &lt;BR /&gt;May we do such thing as:&lt;BR /&gt;-servers are connected to both HP5304. &lt;BR /&gt;-HP5304 implements redundancy with XRRP&lt;BR /&gt;-each HP5304 is connected to both HP9304&lt;BR /&gt;-HP9304 implements redundancy with SRP ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/the-best-way-to-implement-switch-redundancy-in-routed-vlan/m-p/3520699#M4894</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxim_18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-08T03:21:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The best way to implement switch redundancy in routed VLAN environment</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/the-best-way-to-implement-switch-redundancy-in-routed-vlan/m-p/3520700#M4895</link>
      <description>Hi Maxim,&lt;BR /&gt;bevor you decide to use HP 530x as layer 3 switches, please visit the thread "slow/unstable performance on 530x".&lt;BR /&gt;SFT ( Switch Fault Tolerance ) looks like that feature you are looking for. But that is not only a switch feature.&lt;BR /&gt;Visit Intel for more information&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009747.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009747.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards&lt;BR /&gt;Thilo</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/the-best-way-to-implement-switch-redundancy-in-routed-vlan/m-p/3520700#M4895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thilo Schüler-Mach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-30T14:38:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

