<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Witch model replacing procurve 4000m? in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657260#M6227</link>
    <description>Yes.Seems to me that 41xx series are good choice for modification Your network and 4000m/8000m change . 26xx are more mightly and may bought by You ,if bigger data capacity will planned for netflow.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;53xx are not so good for You if you did not planned use their routing properties .</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew_291</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-10-26T03:27:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Witch model replacing procurve 4000m?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657258#M6225</link>
      <description>Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;I will have to buy a switch soon and normaly we chose the procurve 4000m. But they are not avalable anymore. Witch model you suggest me to chose? 4100...?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tx &lt;BR /&gt;Marc</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657258#M6225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marc Villeneuve_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-25T13:37:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Witch model replacing procurve 4000m?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657259#M6226</link>
      <description>I would suggest the 5300xl series as a logical follow up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657259#M6226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sietze Reitsma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-25T17:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Witch model replacing procurve 4000m?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657260#M6227</link>
      <description>Yes.Seems to me that 41xx series are good choice for modification Your network and 4000m/8000m change . 26xx are more mightly and may bought by You ,if bigger data capacity will planned for netflow.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;53xx are not so good for You if you did not planned use their routing properties .</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657260#M6227</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_291</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-26T03:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Witch model replacing procurve 4000m?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657261#M6228</link>
      <description>Marc,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would support Sietze's answer that the 5300 is the most logical. It supports Mesh (if you use a mesh with regards to the 4000M's) and with regards to the price for what you get more also regarding development and future expansion I would spend the couple of hundred euro's more on a 5300 chassis.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SCOOTER</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/witch-model-replacing-procurve-4000m/m-p/3657261#M6228</guid>
      <dc:creator>SCOOTER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-26T08:44:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

