<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: QoS on 53xx and 93xx switche in Switches, Hubs, and Modems</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799255#M8013</link>
    <description>For layer 2 priority bits, 802.1p, the VLANs that you wish to carry this information will need to be tagged. So yes it is true.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Don't forget to assign points to posts that have helped you.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Matt Hobbs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-07T08:51:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>QoS on 53xx and 93xx switche</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799252#M8010</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have to locations, that are connect to each via fibre.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The two locations are setup as following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Main:&lt;BR /&gt;============&lt;BR /&gt;HP Procurve 9308&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Voice VLAN&lt;BR /&gt; - QoS priority is set to 5&lt;BR /&gt;Computer VLAN&lt;BR /&gt;Router VLAN to remote office &lt;BR /&gt; - With a virtual router interface&lt;BR /&gt; - And the command: qos-tos&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Remote office:&lt;BR /&gt;============&lt;BR /&gt;HP Procurve 5308&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Voice VLAN&lt;BR /&gt; - QoS priority is set to 5&lt;BR /&gt;Computer VLAN&lt;BR /&gt;Router VLAN to main office &lt;BR /&gt; - With a virtual router interface&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And in global i have excute the command: &lt;BR /&gt;qos type-of-service diff-services&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a complete QoS implemenatation ?!?!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have looked i the VoIP solutions cookbok, but is the above a good solid running QoS implementation ?!?!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;best regs&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kenneth Mogensen&lt;BR /&gt;Denmark</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799252#M8010</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kenneth Mogensen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T05:31:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QoS on 53xx and 93xx switche</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799253#M8011</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;You have Set up a priority Vlan (Voice Vlan) which is good, and the way is correct.&lt;BR /&gt;The command "qos type-of-service diff-services" is used to enforce prioritization across WAN&lt;BR /&gt;interfaces (the 9300 and 5300), so your implementation is correct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good Luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799253#M8011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohieddin Kharnoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T15:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QoS on 53xx and 93xx switche</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799254#M8012</link>
      <description>Hi again&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... I have problems with the above QoS implementation, and i have a question about tagging and untagge the interfaces in the router interfaces ... should they be tagged or untaged ??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Main if untag &amp;gt;-- routing vlan --&amp;lt; untag if remote&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Main if tag &amp;gt;-- routing vlan --&amp;lt; tag if remote&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The priority bit, is preserved on a tagged interface but not on a untag interface, is that true ?!?!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;best regs&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kenneth Mogensen&lt;BR /&gt;Denmark</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799254#M8012</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kenneth Mogensen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-07T07:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QoS on 53xx and 93xx switche</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799255#M8013</link>
      <description>For layer 2 priority bits, 802.1p, the VLANs that you wish to carry this information will need to be tagged. So yes it is true.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Don't forget to assign points to posts that have helped you.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/switches-hubs-and-modems/qos-on-53xx-and-93xx-switche/m-p/3799255#M8013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Hobbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-07T08:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

