<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Itanium vs Opertron in Integrity Servers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203393#M274</link>
    <description>Hello Jimmy,&lt;BR /&gt;Please check the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sunil Jerath</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-02-27T03:25:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203389#M270</link>
      <description>Can anyone direct me to technical infomation that explain why Itanium is a better chip architect than the Operton?  Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203389#M270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jimmy Tom_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T12:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203390#M271</link>
      <description>Hello:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's a link to information about the Itanium-2. It's from an admittedly biased source - Intel's website:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/business/bss/products/server/itanium2/index.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.intel.com/business/bss/products/server/itanium2/index.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;here's a link to AMD's website for the Opteron processor:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Roger</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203390#M271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger Faucher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T14:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203391#M272</link>
      <description>Well, I searched for itanium vs opteron on google, and found a few people that compared them, but nothing really 'technical'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000275" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000275&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I gather from what i've heard is that the Itanium 2 is directed at the higher-end server market, while the opteron is aimed for the desktop through 4-way windows CPU.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Itanium is:&lt;BR /&gt;more expensive&lt;BR /&gt;more scalable&lt;BR /&gt;fastest on TPC-C ratings&lt;BR /&gt;more cache (6MB compared with 1MB for opteron.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Of course a big advantage is that the Itanium runs HP-UX,  while the opteron doesn't.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Josh</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:21:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203391#M272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua Scott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-26T16:21:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203392#M273</link>
      <description>HI Jimmy,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On the technical specifications side, the i advantage what i see for the Intel Itanium over AMD Operton is only a few.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Itanium2 has got something called L3 cache which varies from 3MB to 4MB to 6MB depending on the type of processor you are chosing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. HP-UX is supported by Itanium2 whereas AMD Opetron doesn't support&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. Itanium has less power dissipation compared to the AMD Opetron..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With best wishes.&lt;BR /&gt;naveej</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203392#M273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveej.K.A</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-27T01:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203393#M274</link>
      <description>Hello Jimmy,&lt;BR /&gt;Please check the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203393#M274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sunil Jerath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-27T03:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Itanium vs Opertron</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203394#M275</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;The Intel Itanium2 and AMD Opteron processors are often incorrectly compared on the basis of one feature only : 64-bit environment.&lt;BR /&gt;The Opteron is a 64-bit extension to the existing x86 architecture.  The Opteron is a way to have easy access to more than 4 GByte memory.&lt;BR /&gt;The Itanium2 processor has much more, such as EPIC (Explicit Parallel Instruction Computing, co-developped by Intel and HP), Predication (to eliminate the impact from mispredicted branches), Large Register Files (128 integer registers, instead of 16 for Opteron; 128 Floating-point registers, instead of 16), Scalability with the same processor (from uni-processor to 64-way today, instead of three type Opteron processors up to an 8-way today), etc ...&lt;BR /&gt;See also &lt;A href="http://www.hp.com/go/itanium" target="_blank"&gt;www.hp.com/go/itanium&lt;/A&gt; for some white papers.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Nico</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/itanium-vs-opertron/m-p/3203394#M275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nico Schockaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-29T08:58:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

