<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic rx4640 cpu upgrade question in Integrity Servers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542821#M938</link>
    <description>current cpu -&amp;gt; 1.3g 2g cache *4cpu&lt;BR /&gt;os-&amp;gt; windows 2003 ee 64bit&lt;BR /&gt;app-&amp;gt;ms sql 2000 ee 64bit&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;which one is the better cpu upgrade solution of two&lt;BR /&gt;1. 1.1g dual core cpu *4&lt;BR /&gt;2. 1.6g 6g cache *4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 21:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jaieun Chu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-11T21:34:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rx4640 cpu upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542821#M938</link>
      <description>current cpu -&amp;gt; 1.3g 2g cache *4cpu&lt;BR /&gt;os-&amp;gt; windows 2003 ee 64bit&lt;BR /&gt;app-&amp;gt;ms sql 2000 ee 64bit&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;which one is the better cpu upgrade solution of two&lt;BR /&gt;1. 1.1g dual core cpu *4&lt;BR /&gt;2. 1.6g 6g cache *4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 21:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542821#M938</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jaieun Chu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-11T21:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rx4640 cpu upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542822#M939</link>
      <description>4 1.1GHz MX2 Dual core CPU's will give you 8 CPU's. They will probably outperform 4 1.6GHz CPU's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For detailed advise, pinpointed to your environment, you should contact HP-Presales. They can show you the exact performance difference between these 2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;marco</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542822#M939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Hogeveen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-12T01:37:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rx4640 cpu upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542823#M940</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The tpmc for an rx4640-8 Itanium2 1100 8p compaired with the rx4640-8 Itanium2 9M 1600 4p is about 18% faster when using HP-UX.  I am not sure that Windows scales the same way as HP-UX.  I hope this gives you an idea.  Be aware that the performance is always depending of the type of application.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nico</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 05:12:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/rx4640-cpu-upgrade-question/m-p/3542823#M940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nico Schockaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-12T05:12:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

