<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Inconsistent CPU speed reported on RX6600 in Integrity Servers</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162329#M9972</link>
    <description>All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am attempting to run a discovery-type script to centrally report on all of the HP-UX servers in my estate. (HP-UX 11.00 - 11.23 for both PA-RISC and IA64 architectures)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I have noted an inconsistency with all of my RX6600's whereby the CPU speed being reported is incorrect.&lt;BR /&gt;The output is the same from all of my RX6600 servers and also (my only) RX3600 server, suggesting a common anomaly in reporting, rather than a rogue system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone clarify the cause of this behaviour please - because I have other IA64 RX4640 () servers which report correctly using ADB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I appreciate that the RX4640's are running processor family 31 = Madison CPU's  so is this reporting anomaly restricted to the Montecito chips?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All output below relates to an RX6600 server:&lt;BR /&gt;# Output from ADB:&lt;BR /&gt;#echo "itick_per_usec/D" |adb -o /stand/vmunix /dev/kmem&lt;BR /&gt;# Output:&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: &lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: 399   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NB: I am unable to get any CPU info out of stm  for comparison: &lt;BR /&gt;STM output:&lt;BR /&gt;cstm&amp;gt;selclass qualifier cpu&lt;BR /&gt;cstm&amp;gt;info&lt;BR /&gt;     ^-- (Information) is currently disabled. --&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HOWEVER, the CPU speed (as reported by machinfo and also from EFI 'System Information')  shows that my CPU's are 1.6 GHz (Montecito) processors&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EFI System Info:&lt;BR /&gt;================&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PROCESSOR MODULE INFORMATION&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;           # of               L3      L4      Family/&lt;BR /&gt;   CPU     Logical            Cache   Cache   Model         Processor&lt;BR /&gt;   Module  CPUs     Speed     Size    Size    (hex.)   Rev  State&lt;BR /&gt;   ------  -------  --------  ------  ------  -------  ---  ------------&lt;BR /&gt;     0        2      1.6 GHz   12 MB    None   20/00    C2        Active&lt;BR /&gt;     1        2      1.6 GHz   12 MB    None   20/00    C2        Active&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU threads are turned off.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;machinfo output:&lt;BR /&gt;================&lt;BR /&gt;CPU info:&lt;BR /&gt;   Number of CPUs = 4&lt;BR /&gt;   Clock speed = 1595 MHz&lt;BR /&gt;   Bus speed   = 532 MT/s&lt;BR /&gt;   CPUID registers&lt;BR /&gt;      vendor information =       "GenuineIntel"&lt;BR /&gt;      processor serial number =  0x0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;      processor version info =   0x0000000020000704&lt;BR /&gt;         architecture revision:       0&lt;BR /&gt;         processor family:           32   Intel(R) Itanium 2 9000 series&lt;BR /&gt;         processor model:             0   Intel(R) Itanium 2 9000 series&lt;BR /&gt;         processor revision:          7   Stepping C2&lt;BR /&gt;         largest CPUID reg:           4&lt;BR /&gt;      processor capabilities =   0x0000000000000005&lt;BR /&gt;                      implements long branch:  1&lt;BR /&gt;        implements 16-byte atomic operations:  1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pete Des Moulins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-10T09:41:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistent CPU speed reported on RX6600</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162329#M9972</link>
      <description>All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am attempting to run a discovery-type script to centrally report on all of the HP-UX servers in my estate. (HP-UX 11.00 - 11.23 for both PA-RISC and IA64 architectures)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I have noted an inconsistency with all of my RX6600's whereby the CPU speed being reported is incorrect.&lt;BR /&gt;The output is the same from all of my RX6600 servers and also (my only) RX3600 server, suggesting a common anomaly in reporting, rather than a rogue system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone clarify the cause of this behaviour please - because I have other IA64 RX4640 () servers which report correctly using ADB.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I appreciate that the RX4640's are running processor family 31 = Madison CPU's  so is this reporting anomaly restricted to the Montecito chips?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All output below relates to an RX6600 server:&lt;BR /&gt;# Output from ADB:&lt;BR /&gt;#echo "itick_per_usec/D" |adb -o /stand/vmunix /dev/kmem&lt;BR /&gt;# Output:&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: &lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: 399   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NB: I am unable to get any CPU info out of stm  for comparison: &lt;BR /&gt;STM output:&lt;BR /&gt;cstm&amp;gt;selclass qualifier cpu&lt;BR /&gt;cstm&amp;gt;info&lt;BR /&gt;     ^-- (Information) is currently disabled. --&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HOWEVER, the CPU speed (as reported by machinfo and also from EFI 'System Information')  shows that my CPU's are 1.6 GHz (Montecito) processors&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EFI System Info:&lt;BR /&gt;================&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PROCESSOR MODULE INFORMATION&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;           # of               L3      L4      Family/&lt;BR /&gt;   CPU     Logical            Cache   Cache   Model         Processor&lt;BR /&gt;   Module  CPUs     Speed     Size    Size    (hex.)   Rev  State&lt;BR /&gt;   ------  -------  --------  ------  ------  -------  ---  ------------&lt;BR /&gt;     0        2      1.6 GHz   12 MB    None   20/00    C2        Active&lt;BR /&gt;     1        2      1.6 GHz   12 MB    None   20/00    C2        Active&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CPU threads are turned off.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;machinfo output:&lt;BR /&gt;================&lt;BR /&gt;CPU info:&lt;BR /&gt;   Number of CPUs = 4&lt;BR /&gt;   Clock speed = 1595 MHz&lt;BR /&gt;   Bus speed   = 532 MT/s&lt;BR /&gt;   CPUID registers&lt;BR /&gt;      vendor information =       "GenuineIntel"&lt;BR /&gt;      processor serial number =  0x0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;      processor version info =   0x0000000020000704&lt;BR /&gt;         architecture revision:       0&lt;BR /&gt;         processor family:           32   Intel(R) Itanium 2 9000 series&lt;BR /&gt;         processor model:             0   Intel(R) Itanium 2 9000 series&lt;BR /&gt;         processor revision:          7   Stepping C2&lt;BR /&gt;         largest CPUID reg:           4&lt;BR /&gt;      processor capabilities =   0x0000000000000005&lt;BR /&gt;                      implements long branch:  1&lt;BR /&gt;        implements 16-byte atomic operations:  1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162329#M9972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Des Moulins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T09:41:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent CPU speed reported on RX6600</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162330#M9973</link>
      <description>OK - I have just found a previous forum question that covers the same issue that I posed:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Link: &lt;A href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1232229" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1232229&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162330#M9973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Des Moulins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T09:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent CPU speed reported on RX6600</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162331#M9974</link>
      <description>Closed - see previous update</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162331#M9974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Des Moulins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T09:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent CPU speed reported on RX6600</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162332#M9975</link>
      <description>Pete,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually itick_per_usec *never* showed the processors core frequency, it always showed the processors itimer frequency. It's just that up until the Montecito processors these values were always the same. machinfo is the correct method for getting this info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This just goes to show that you should never assume that anything that involves poking around in the kernel is going to have consistent behaviour between systems. (yes I *know* there are plenty of ITRC docs which indicate this as a method for finding out info - doesn't make it right though!) The problem with all this "echo whatever/D |adb -o /stand/vmunix /dev/kmem" stuff is that we reserve the right to change anything in the kernel without telling you anyway...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/integrity-servers/inconsistent-cpu-speed-reported-on-rx6600/m-p/5162332#M9975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T10:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

