<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64 in Operating System - Tru64 Unix</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574581#M15352</link>
    <description>ro:/&amp;gt;#vmstat -P&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Total Physical Memory =  2560.00 M&lt;BR /&gt;                      =   327680 pages&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Physical Memory Clusters:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;start_pfn     end_pfn        type  size_pages / size_bytes&lt;BR /&gt;         0         404         pal         404 /    3.16M&lt;BR /&gt;       404      327671          os      327267 / 2556.77M&lt;BR /&gt;    327671      327680         pal           9 /   72.00k&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Physical Memory Use:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; start_pfn     end_pfn        type  size_pages / size_bytes&lt;BR /&gt;       404         521    scavenge         117 /  936.00k&lt;BR /&gt;       521        1681        text        1160 /    9.06M&lt;BR /&gt;      1681        1939        data         258 /    2.02M&lt;BR /&gt;      1939        2437         bss         498 /    3.89M&lt;BR /&gt;      2437        2729      kdebug         292 /    2.28M&lt;BR /&gt;      2729        2737     cfgmgmt           8 /   64.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2737        2739       locks           2 /   16.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2739        2755        pmap          16 /  128.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2755        4078   unixtable        1323 /   10.34M&lt;BR /&gt;      4078        4090        logs          12 /   96.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      4090       11752    vmtables        7662 /   59.86M&lt;BR /&gt;     11752      327671     managed      315919 / 2468.12M&lt;BR /&gt;                             ============================&lt;BR /&gt;         Total Physical Memory Use:     327267 / 2556.77M&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Managed Pages Break Down:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       free pages = 3073&lt;BR /&gt;     active pages = 103235&lt;BR /&gt;   inactive pages = 57864&lt;BR /&gt;      wired pages = 62164&lt;BR /&gt;        ubc pages = 89699&lt;BR /&gt;        ==================&lt;BR /&gt;            Total = 316035&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WIRED Pages Break Down:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   vm wired pages = 9432&lt;BR /&gt;  ubc wired pages = 0&lt;BR /&gt;  meta data pages = 9747&lt;BR /&gt;     malloc pages = 36616&lt;BR /&gt;     contig pages = 3702&lt;BR /&gt;    user ptepages = 2050&lt;BR /&gt;  kernel ptepages = 330&lt;BR /&gt;    free ptepages = 8&lt;BR /&gt;        ==================&lt;BR /&gt;            Total = 61885&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T13:23:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574577#M15348</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am running an aplication that uses Oracle 8 at a DS-25 cluster running TRU64 5.1B PK4.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Oracle was running out of shared memory so DBAs changed a Oracle parameter in order to let Oracle get more memory. This made the system run out of memory, and Oracle could not start again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Before telling DBA´s to make the change i checked the output of vmstat -P.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was told long ago that to check the memory that could be used(free), i should sum the free-pages and the inactive-pages. Is this correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also i have seen that UBC is getting a lot of memory, how can i check if it´s actually using it?. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know i can reduce the max percentage UBC can grow, but i want to be sure if i will not trigger another issue by doing this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you very much in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:53:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574577#M15348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-30T06:53:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574578#M15349</link>
      <description>I think you mean, the DBAs changed an Oracle parameter and now Oracle can't start ... because its asking for more than the system can give.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What did they change ?  If you tell the forum what they changed, we may be able to suggest what other things may need adjusting.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Altering the SGA (?) without considering other parameters is not a good way to proceed ;-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also want to post your /etc/sysconfigtab, and whatever console messages and/or Oracle log messages appeared when Oracle couldn't start.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;JM</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574578#M15349</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Manger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-31T15:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574579#M15350</link>
      <description>Yes that's what i meant. They did that change because they were having problems.&lt;BR /&gt;I will gather precise information on the errors and changes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My goal is to know how memory works at TRU64, and know if i can tune any parameter to optimize memory utilzation, and make the system survive some more years.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you very for your help!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574579#M15350</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-31T23:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574580#M15351</link>
      <description>The problems seen by the people that works with the Oracle 8.1.7.4 database is that the shared-pool was totally consumed.&lt;BR /&gt;After changing the shared pool from 50MB to 150MB, the database startup showed:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SVRMGR&amp;gt; ORA-27102: out of memory&lt;BR /&gt;Compaq Tru64 UNIX Error: 12: Not enough space&lt;BR /&gt;Additional information: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Additional information: 514&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Before doing this we checked the vmstat -P results and the free-pages + inactive pages ~ 450MB, so i told them to proceed to increase the shared-pool in 100MB. Perhaps that was unwise, but the errors in the database access were preventing, and are preventing the systema to work correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will post the actual vmstat -P output and the /etc/sysconfig file in the next posts</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574580#M15351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T12:58:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574581#M15352</link>
      <description>ro:/&amp;gt;#vmstat -P&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Total Physical Memory =  2560.00 M&lt;BR /&gt;                      =   327680 pages&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Physical Memory Clusters:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;start_pfn     end_pfn        type  size_pages / size_bytes&lt;BR /&gt;         0         404         pal         404 /    3.16M&lt;BR /&gt;       404      327671          os      327267 / 2556.77M&lt;BR /&gt;    327671      327680         pal           9 /   72.00k&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Physical Memory Use:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; start_pfn     end_pfn        type  size_pages / size_bytes&lt;BR /&gt;       404         521    scavenge         117 /  936.00k&lt;BR /&gt;       521        1681        text        1160 /    9.06M&lt;BR /&gt;      1681        1939        data         258 /    2.02M&lt;BR /&gt;      1939        2437         bss         498 /    3.89M&lt;BR /&gt;      2437        2729      kdebug         292 /    2.28M&lt;BR /&gt;      2729        2737     cfgmgmt           8 /   64.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2737        2739       locks           2 /   16.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2739        2755        pmap          16 /  128.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      2755        4078   unixtable        1323 /   10.34M&lt;BR /&gt;      4078        4090        logs          12 /   96.00k&lt;BR /&gt;      4090       11752    vmtables        7662 /   59.86M&lt;BR /&gt;     11752      327671     managed      315919 / 2468.12M&lt;BR /&gt;                             ============================&lt;BR /&gt;         Total Physical Memory Use:     327267 / 2556.77M&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Managed Pages Break Down:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       free pages = 3073&lt;BR /&gt;     active pages = 103235&lt;BR /&gt;   inactive pages = 57864&lt;BR /&gt;      wired pages = 62164&lt;BR /&gt;        ubc pages = 89699&lt;BR /&gt;        ==================&lt;BR /&gt;            Total = 316035&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WIRED Pages Break Down:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   vm wired pages = 9432&lt;BR /&gt;  ubc wired pages = 0&lt;BR /&gt;  meta data pages = 9747&lt;BR /&gt;     malloc pages = 36616&lt;BR /&gt;     contig pages = 3702&lt;BR /&gt;    user ptepages = 2050&lt;BR /&gt;  kernel ptepages = 330&lt;BR /&gt;    free ptepages = 8&lt;BR /&gt;        ==================&lt;BR /&gt;            Total = 61885&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574581#M15352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T13:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574582#M15353</link>
      <description>I am attaching the /etc/sysconfigtab file and also got more precise information about Oracle errors seen before the change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Precise errors:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4248 bytes of shared memory&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then DBAs changed the following parameter:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;shared_pool_size = 50M --&amp;gt; 100M&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574582#M15353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T13:55:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574583#M15354</link>
      <description>Martin, check this :&lt;BR /&gt;"Tuning HP Tru64 UNIX V5.1A and V5.1B for Oracle Environments"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9949ENW.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-9949ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574583#M15354</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T15:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574584#M15355</link>
      <description>A collegue has noted the following in the proc subsystem:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;max_per_proc_address_space and per_proc_address_space parameters are less than default,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;max_per_proc_address_space = 536870912&lt;BR /&gt;per_proc_address_space = 536870912&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can this prevent Oracle from taking the space itÂ´s needing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574584#M15355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-02T17:16:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574585#M15356</link>
      <description>It could just be your DBS made a mistake about the units of memory allocation.&lt;BR /&gt;It could be bytes, 512byte blocks, 2Kbyte pages or even 8Kbyte pages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if your DBA meant bytes, but the parameter adresses blocks or pages, the result will be obvious.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You could also generate a sys_check output?&lt;BR /&gt;It will advise you about current environment and advise system parameters.&lt;BR /&gt;It my even recognize the Oracle environment and advise accordingly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know many administrators want to be in control themselves, but ist's a helpfull tool.&lt;BR /&gt;Especially it helps checking relationship between parameters.&lt;BR /&gt;you'll allso find many statements with options there you can use separately in the future.&lt;BR /&gt;If needed use the man pages for explanation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574585#M15356</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T08:15:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574586#M15357</link>
      <description>Tonight i will modify:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;max_per_proc_address_space to 4294967296.&lt;BR /&gt;and&lt;BR /&gt;per_proc_address_space to 4294967296&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And i will run the sys_check utility, as i started it at 15:30hs and my system CPU utilization increased too much for a busy hour.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will check the output of sys_check, but is there any way you can tell me if Oracle is getting trouble to allocate memory at startup because of this parameters or any other Kernel parameter?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In your experience, what Kernel params can be producing the Oracle&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SVRMGR&amp;gt; ORA-27102: out of memory&lt;BR /&gt;Compaq Tru64 UNIX Error: 12: Not enough space&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:42:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574586#M15357</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T17:42:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574587#M15358</link>
      <description>regarding&lt;BR /&gt;SVRMGR&amp;gt; ORA-27102: out of memory&lt;BR /&gt;Compaq Tru64 UNIX Error: 12: Not enough space&lt;BR /&gt; this link &lt;A href="http://www.itags.org/database/234237/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.itags.org/database/234237/&lt;/A&gt; suggests it is a swapspace problem.&lt;BR /&gt;Swapspace size is normally sized about 1,5 times physical memory.&lt;BR /&gt;Offcourse adding swapspace (virtual memory) will reduce "out of memory" messages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;=========================&lt;BR /&gt;But on a databassystems normally you don't want swapping to occur!&lt;BR /&gt;=========================&lt;BR /&gt;Swapping in/out reduces performance.&lt;BR /&gt;So the total memory requested by oracle should be less than max physical memory minus room for other processes including users and batchprocesses.&lt;BR /&gt;As you report "Total Physical Memory = 2560.00 M" I would suggest to limit the oracle parameters to use max 2GB instead of raising the system limit so swapping will occur.&lt;BR /&gt;If your database really needs more memory, you better add physical memory before increasing oracle parameters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regarding :&lt;BR /&gt;ORA-04031: unable to allocate 4248 bytes of shared memory &lt;BR /&gt;you need to look also at the shm_max&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;from the link i posted earlier.&lt;BR /&gt;If only Oracle is being used on the system, you can increase the size of shm_max to 4 GB minus 16&lt;BR /&gt;MB, that is:&lt;BR /&gt;0xff000000 or 4278190080&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This should better address your initial problem then increasing oracle using more memory.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574587#M15358</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-04T08:10:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574588#M15359</link>
      <description>Thank you Pieter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regarding swap space i think i am ok (as seen in attached file).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually i have done a maint operation this morning. I changed max_per_proc_address_space to 4294967296 and per_proc_address_space to 4294967296.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After that i changed oracle init.ora shared_memory_size to 150M and the database restarted fine without problema.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now a few hours later, the main aplication running in the server started telling it was out of memory, and stopped working correctly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Shared memory is set to 2139095040 ~ 2GB so i guess thatÂ´s not a problem also.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We went back those two parameters to the original values 536870912, and the shared_pool_size back to 100MB and the system went back to normal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I checked vmstat -P and there were still free pages left at the moment of the failure, so i am confused and in a big trouble!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any further help will be highly appreciated,&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574588#M15359</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-04T19:23:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574589#M15360</link>
      <description>In my opinion 8GB swapspace is extremely large for a system with 2,5G physical memory!&lt;BR /&gt;Especially in a database environment.&lt;BR /&gt;How many "normal" (non-database) processes are ther on youtr system?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think you and your DBA need to review the oracle parameters against unix system parameters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;maybe you can post both sysconfigtab and oracle config to review?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My knowledge is from a sybase environment, not oracle.&lt;BR /&gt;But maybe i can find some mismatch.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574589#M15360</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T08:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574590#M15361</link>
      <description>Hi Pieter,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are ~20 non database proceses.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;By the way, i made a terrible mistake when changing the max_per_proc_address_space to 4294967296 and per_proc_address_space to 4294967296.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I did the operation with:&lt;BR /&gt;"sysconfigdb -u -f stanza-file proc", i put a u!!! instead of m!!! So all proc parameters except the ones i put in the stanza file were set to very low values(defaults?)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have changed them to the values in the attached file and now the system is working for 8 hours without any proccess complaining about lack of memory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I still do not know what was the Kernel parameter that made the aplications fail to get memory, but for sure i made a terrible mistake.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you very much Pieter,&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:32:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574590#M15361</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T18:32:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574591#M15362</link>
      <description>I have attached the memory usage of one of the machines with trouble, it looks ok as far as i understand.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574591#M15362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Wolff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T18:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory utilization and tunning in TRU64</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574592#M15363</link>
      <description>Hi Martin,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sysconfigdb should make a (numebered) backup before applying changes.&lt;BR /&gt;Have you checked if there are any sysconfigtab.&lt;SEQENCENUMBER&gt; files present?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If so you may be able to retrieve the missing sysconfig parameters.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SEQENCENUMBER&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/memory-utilization-and-tunning-in-tru64/m-p/4574592#M15363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter 't Hart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-08T08:13:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

