<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched? in Operating System - Tru64 Unix</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164656#M4411</link>
    <description>but you can use the previous patch id, right?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-01-22T06:24:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164650#M4405</link>
      <description>Configuration:  Tru64 UNIX V4.0F w/ PK7.&lt;BR /&gt;   Two DS20s using ASE clustering.&lt;BR /&gt;   Each node has a "box" IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;   Alias IP addresses defined for "services".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The primary problem:&lt;BR /&gt;   An application attempts to connect to&lt;BR /&gt;   a second system via a TCP/IP connection.&lt;BR /&gt;   The second system is behind a firewall that&lt;BR /&gt;   allows packets from the box's specific IP&lt;BR /&gt;   address to pass through the firewall.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   For some reason the source IP address that&lt;BR /&gt;   the application gets is sometimes NOT the&lt;BR /&gt;   box IP address, but an alias address.  As&lt;BR /&gt;   a result the application cannot connect to&lt;BR /&gt;   the second system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   Note that there are several V4.0F clusters&lt;BR /&gt;   configured in this manner, and this problem&lt;BR /&gt;   has only recently surfaced on a particular&lt;BR /&gt;   system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The secondary problem:&lt;BR /&gt;   In the release notes for patch kit 7 there&lt;BR /&gt;   are several notes which seems to indicate&lt;BR /&gt;   that this problem has been fixed.  To wit:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   - Fixes a problem when a default IP&lt;BR /&gt;     address and a cluster virtual IP address&lt;BR /&gt;     are interchanged after a network&lt;BR /&gt;     restart.  The defaylt interface address&lt;BR /&gt;     is used by all outgoing traffic and the&lt;BR /&gt;     alias address is only usable for the&lt;BR /&gt;     incoming packets.  (Patch 859.00)&lt;BR /&gt;   - Fixes a problem when using multiple&lt;BR /&gt;     subnets on a network interface; APR&lt;BR /&gt;     request packets sent by the system will&lt;BR /&gt;     contain the IP alias address in the&lt;BR /&gt;     sender field when that alias is in the&lt;BR /&gt;     same subnet as the requeted IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;     (Also Patch 859.00)&lt;BR /&gt;   - Fixes a problem that sometimes caused&lt;BR /&gt;     the system to select the incorrect IP&lt;BR /&gt;     source address for out-going connections&lt;BR /&gt;     when using IP aliases and subnetting on&lt;BR /&gt;     a network interface.  (Sounds &amp;gt;really&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;     good, and also in Patch 859.00)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   The problem is that PK7 is installed.&lt;BR /&gt;   I looked at the Patch Kit 8 Release Notes&lt;BR /&gt;   and saw these same patch descriptions for&lt;BR /&gt;   Patch 1493.00 and thought "it's fixed",&lt;BR /&gt;   but when I saw them in the PK7 Release&lt;BR /&gt;   Notes I began to wonder.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   How do I tell if the PK7 patch has been&lt;BR /&gt;   patched in PK8?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   PK8 &amp;gt;also&amp;lt; has this additional note that&lt;BR /&gt;   appears to be relevant.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   - Corrects a problem which could result in&lt;BR /&gt;     an alias IP address being incorrectly&lt;BR /&gt;     promoted to being the primary adddress&lt;BR /&gt;     when another alias is removed.  (Patch&lt;BR /&gt;     1493.00 also.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   The problem is that we have not yet figured&lt;BR /&gt;   out if there is a specific set of actions&lt;BR /&gt;   that results in the alias address being&lt;BR /&gt;   used, so we don't know if this description&lt;BR /&gt;   fits our problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now this problem was seen once before about 2&lt;BR /&gt;months ago on one member of another cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;The member was rebooted and the problem has&lt;BR /&gt;not been since since it showed up on this&lt;BR /&gt;cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So the questions are:  what is the likely&lt;BR /&gt;cause of this problem.  (I know, a bug in the&lt;BR /&gt;TCP/IP stack.)  Has the fix in PK7 been fixed&lt;BR /&gt;in PK8?  (I don't know.)  Help!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164650#M4405</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-14T14:03:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164651#M4406</link>
      <description>Derek,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you verify that the patch (859.00) is really installed. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try this&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# dupatch -track -type patch | grep 00859&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Joris</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164651#M4406</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joris Denayer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-15T02:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164652#M4407</link>
      <description>Joris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is what dupatch says:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# dupatch -track -type patch | grep 00859&lt;BR /&gt;     Patch 00859.00 - Security (SSRT0563U, SSRT0676U, SSRT0742U)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164652#M4407</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-15T13:12:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164653#M4408</link>
      <description>I just found out that my query may have been misunderstood.  I'll try to restate it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Suppose there is a bug in the operating system, which we'll call "B".  Bug "B" is reported to HP, and it works its way back to the an engineering team. (UBPG or USEG)  Someone takes a look at the bug and the code and sees "the problem", and so a fix ("F") is produced to correct bug "B".  This fix is released as a patch, and is later incorporated into a Patch Kit ("PK.A").  Wonderful....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Except that bug "B" continues to show up.  Bug again is reported to HP.  After ascertaining that "F" was already applied to the system, the bug is reported (again) to the engineering team.  Again the code is examined, and a new and different fix is created ("F2") to correct bug "B".  This fix is incorporated into the next Patch Kit ("PK.B").  Wonderful also.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is that the release notes for PK.B may not mention the fact that the previous fix wasn't a complete fix.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So the question is, how does one tell if a fix was re-fixed?  In the situation at hand, the applied patch says that it has fixed the problem, but it clearly has not.  The next patch kit *also* says that it fixes the problem.  Is this merely a re-packaging of the fix that doesn't fix things, or is this fix one that actually does the job?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164653#M4408</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-21T15:19:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164654#M4409</link>
      <description>So the answer is easy:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;call HP, ask if the previous escalation number is still fixed in the given patchkit. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The release notes nor the patch description doesn't list all fixes in detail!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164654#M4409</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-22T02:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164655#M4410</link>
      <description>OK Ralf, I could do that, but I don't know what the original escalation number is.  Do you?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164655#M4410</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-22T06:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164656#M4411</link>
      <description>but you can use the previous patch id, right?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164656#M4411</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-22T06:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164657#M4412</link>
      <description>Well, I'm not sure.  These patch IDs don't normally seem to refer to a single patch, but rather to a whole bunch of patches that are combined together.  (I never did learn why that was being done.  Similarly I never figured out why one group of patches would get a new patch number in the next aggregate patch kit.  Note that in my original posting I mentioned that Patch 859.00 seems to have been renamed to Patch 1493.00.  I can only guess that the patches are "related", perhaps by virtue of the patched files all belonging to the same base OS subset.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since Patch 859.00 contains so many fixes, I suspect that there were a lot of QARs and/or IPMTs that were filed against the components that comprise Patch 859.00.  I assumed you meant *that* number, rather than the "packaging" number, and I have no idea was the QAR/IPMT number is.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164657#M4412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-22T06:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164658#M4413</link>
      <description>the patch description contains a number for each patch. A patch contains one or more fixes which are listed with each single number and with a list of the replaced modules and their checksum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the checksums of the kernel modules in both patches or on your machines are identically then it contains the same release/version.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Btw. using the command "what" on the requested modules will give you a clue if the releases are identically.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And if this will not answer your question, open a case within the HP support center and they will help you finding a solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164658#M4413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralf Puchner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-23T03:56:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP source address problem/V4.0F/PK7/patch patched?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164659#M4414</link>
      <description>OK.  Thanks Ralf!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 05:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-tru64-unix/ip-source-address-problem-v4-0f-pk7-patch-patched/m-p/3164659#M4414</guid>
      <dc:creator>Derek Haining</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-23T05:38:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

