<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Importance of Synchronize-All-Jobs lpd parameter in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/importance-of-synchronize-all-jobs-lpd-parameter/m-p/4705249#M100462</link>
    <description>Hello all.  So... I'm being dense today and I'm reading the explanation of the lpd parameter Synchronize-All-Jobs and not understanding it (I've attached the definition of the parameter for convenience).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My inbound execution queue, TCPIP$LPD_IN_nodename_nn, has been going into the stopped state due to exhaustion of dynamic memory. This happens when pending print jobs pile up due to a stopped destination queue (we're talking about hundreds and hundreds of jobs that can pile up in a matter of minutes.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've already upped my quotas to pretty high numbers and I stumbled upon this parameter.  It looks like a potential savior to my problem but I don't understand the ramifications of changing it to FALSE, if any. All that's important to me is that my print jobs print in the order they were submitted. I don't care about OPCOM messages about each job completion (as referred to in the parameter description).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just wondering if anyone with direct experience on this parameter had any input.  Thanks!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EdgarZamora_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-26T17:16:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Importance of Synchronize-All-Jobs lpd parameter</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/importance-of-synchronize-all-jobs-lpd-parameter/m-p/4705249#M100462</link>
      <description>Hello all.  So... I'm being dense today and I'm reading the explanation of the lpd parameter Synchronize-All-Jobs and not understanding it (I've attached the definition of the parameter for convenience).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My inbound execution queue, TCPIP$LPD_IN_nodename_nn, has been going into the stopped state due to exhaustion of dynamic memory. This happens when pending print jobs pile up due to a stopped destination queue (we're talking about hundreds and hundreds of jobs that can pile up in a matter of minutes.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've already upped my quotas to pretty high numbers and I stumbled upon this parameter.  It looks like a potential savior to my problem but I don't understand the ramifications of changing it to FALSE, if any. All that's important to me is that my print jobs print in the order they were submitted. I don't care about OPCOM messages about each job completion (as referred to in the parameter description).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just wondering if anyone with direct experience on this parameter had any input.  Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/importance-of-synchronize-all-jobs-lpd-parameter/m-p/4705249#M100462</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdgarZamora_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-26T17:16:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Importance of Synchronize-All-Jobs lpd parameter</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/importance-of-synchronize-all-jobs-lpd-parameter/m-p/4705250#M100463</link>
      <description>LPD is using memory, and not scaling, and the help text implies the folks are aware of the behavior and the limits.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hundreds and thousands of jobs stuffed into a queue really isn't all that large a value, however.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And yes, setting that to FALSE might paper over the bug.  But I'd call up HP directly and discuss this regardless, given this behavior is arguably somewhere between a bug and a design limit within in TCP/IP Services, and you're not really pushing this stuff all that hard.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alternatively (and if your application permits it), offload this LPD processing onto a box that can handle the load; get VMS out of the path.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/importance-of-synchronize-all-jobs-lpd-parameter/m-p/4705250#M100463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-26T17:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

