<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Shadow set merge after crash in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269824#M101052</link>
    <description>Because merges are rather I/O intensive, they are somewhat throttled to prevent any slowing down of the entire system.  If I recall the algorithms correctly (its been a while), there is intensive verification to prevent any possible data overwrites.  It is the data checking that takes the time.  Others will likely add details, but that timeframe is typical for the shadow merges I have seen recently.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dan</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abrsvc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-13T20:36:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269823#M101051</link>
      <description>Running OpenVMS V8.3 on an AlphaServer DS20 with a shadowset on two 36Gig drives formatted as ODS-5 volume.  Only 7 gigs are in use but the merge after reboot took about 1 hour and 45 minutes on a system with very little use (no users logged in).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ show shadow dsa30&lt;BR /&gt;DSA30:   Volume Label: ORACLE&lt;BR /&gt;  Virtual Unit State:   Steady State&lt;BR /&gt;  Enhanced Shadowing Features in use:&lt;BR /&gt;        Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  VU Timeout Value      3600    VU Site Value          0&lt;BR /&gt;  Copy/Merge Priority   5000    Mini Merge       Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;  Recovery Delay Per Served Member                    30&lt;BR /&gt;  Merge Delay Factor     200    Delay Threshold      200&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  HBMM Policy&lt;BR /&gt;    HBMM Reset Threshold: 1000000&lt;BR /&gt;    HBMM Master lists:&lt;BR /&gt;      Up to any 2 nodes in the cluster - Multiuse: 0&lt;BR /&gt;    Modified blocks since bitmap creation: 13081&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Device $1$DKC0                Master Member&lt;BR /&gt;    Read Cost              2    Site 0&lt;BR /&gt;    Member Timeout       120&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Device $1$DKB300&lt;BR /&gt;    Read Cost              2    Site 0&lt;BR /&gt;    Member Timeout       120&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What can I do to improve (reduce) the merge time?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:49:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269823#M101051</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Carter_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T19:49:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269824#M101052</link>
      <description>Because merges are rather I/O intensive, they are somewhat throttled to prevent any slowing down of the entire system.  If I recall the algorithms correctly (its been a while), there is intensive verification to prevent any possible data overwrites.  It is the data checking that takes the time.  Others will likely add details, but that timeframe is typical for the shadow merges I have seen recently.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Dan</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269824#M101052</guid>
      <dc:creator>abrsvc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T20:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269825#M101053</link>
      <description>SAVDBA,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any messages in the log?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since shadow copies are direct block-for-block copies, the number of blocks in use is not directly relevant to how long the copy takes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the volumes do not need to be fully available to 36GB, it may pay to reorganize storage so the entire volume is not shadowed (and then use SET VOLUME) to increase the size of the volumes as needed. This is somewhat different spin on the techniques I spoke of in "Migrating OpenVMS Storage Environments without Interruption or Disruption" at the 2007 HP Enterprise Technology Symposium (see &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com/hptechnologyforum/2007/1512.html)." target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com/hptechnologyforum/2007/1512.html).&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Bob Gezelter, &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269825#M101053</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Gezelter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269826#M101054</link>
      <description>Bob,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From the operator.log &lt;BR /&gt;%%%%%%%%%%%  OPCOM  13-JAN-2011 09:54:30.79  %%%%%%%%%%% Message from user SYSTEM on SADS20 %SHADOW_SERVER-I-SSRVBEGMRG, BEGINNING merge operation on _DSA30: at LBN: 0, I/O size: 127 blocks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;%%%%%%%%%%%  OPCOM  13-JAN-2011 09:54:30.79  %%%%%%%%%%% Message from user SYSTEM on SADS20 -SHADOW_SERVER-I-SSRVINIMRG, ID number: 38000045, Threshold 200, Factor 200.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then of course the notice of the completion.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interesting idea, only use part of the disk and expand as needed...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269826#M101054</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Carter_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269827#M101055</link>
      <description>Kevin,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Full merges take a long time. Typically much longer than a straight copy. I notice that you have Mini Merge enabled, and wonder why it wasn't used. How many nodes crashed, and how did you recover?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please check your configuration to make sure you're allowing all optimisations.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269827#M101055</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T22:39:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269828#M101056</link>
      <description>John,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The system is a stand alone server, the drives are on separate controllers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure what you mean by "make sure you're allowing all optimisations".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269828#M101056</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Carter_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T23:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269829#M101057</link>
      <description>$ HELP SET SHADOW/ENABLE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SET&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  SHADOW&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    /ENABLE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          /ENABLE=HBMM&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       Note: This qualifier applies to HBMM operations only. If you specify any non-HBMM qualifiers with this one, the command will fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       Enables host-based minimerge (HBMM) on the specified shadow set or across the entire cluster if an applicable HBMM policy exists. To learn more about HBMM policies and their application, see the HP Volume Shadowing for OpenVMS manual.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;       HBMM is the only supported value for /ENABLE, and it must be included.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Host Based Mini Merge is an optimisation which bypasses the need for a full merge under some circumstances. If it's used it can drammatically reduce merge times (ie: your objective). However, there are quite a few conditions which need to be met before HBMM can be used. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See the Shadowing manual, and in particular, the section in Chapter 1 labelled "HBMM Configuration Requirements" and all of Chapter 8 "Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM)".&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269829#M101057</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T23:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269830#M101058</link>
      <description>John,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HBMM is enabled, the formating was lost on the original post above.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Enhanced Shadowing Features in use:&lt;BR /&gt;Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269830#M101058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Carter_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-13T23:52:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269831#M101059</link>
      <description>The system is a stand alone server, the drives are on separate controllers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HBMM requires the use of at least a two-node cluster.  In other words, while you may have HBMM enabled, the bitmap that's being created to track writes is useless.  If you have a spare Alpha or IA64 system gathering dust (and a cluster license), I'd boot it up, form a two-node cluster, and give HBMM a shot.  In general, HBMM merges will complete in seconds, or a few minutes at most (depending on various parameters, but HBMM merges are quite quick).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This assumes some storage that is directly-attached to both systems; if the MSCP-serving node crashes, then the remaining node can't access the device(s), and can't merge.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;               -- Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:10:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269831#M101059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T00:10:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269832#M101060</link>
      <description>HBMM requires the use of at least a two-node cluster</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269832#M101060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Carter_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T00:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow set merge after crash</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269833#M101061</link>
      <description>&amp;gt; Merge Delay Factor 200 Delay Threshold 200&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; What can I do to improve (reduce) the merge time?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Give more I/Os to the merge operation (which of course adversely affects user operation). The above two settings are the knobs to do that; see the section titled "Improving Performance of Unassisted MergeOperations" at &lt;A href="http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/732final/aa-pvxmj-te/00/00/75-con.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/732final/aa-pvxmj-te/00/00/75-con.html&lt;/A&gt; .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Martin</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/shadow-set-merge-after-crash/m-p/5269833#M101061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Vorlaender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T03:12:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

