<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MSA$UTIL using arbitrary drives on SB40c for RAID set in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/msa-util-using-arbitrary-drives-on-sb40c-for-raid-set/m-p/4255355#M15108</link>
    <description>BL860c, VMS 8.3-1H1 w/Fibre_SCSC V0200 patch, SB40c w/6 146GB SAS drives, MSA$UTIL V3.00 build 05-Apr-2008&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm testing some 'what if' scenarios for creating logical units on a SB40c.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My script does the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$mcr msa$util&lt;BR /&gt;set controller pkb0:&lt;BR /&gt;add unit 0 /disk=(1,2) /raid=1&lt;BR /&gt;add unit 1 /disk=(3,4) /raid=1&lt;BR /&gt;etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, when I remove the drive from bay 2 (my 'what if' scenario), instead of the above add unit 0 command failing as I would expect, MSA$UTIL happily creates the unit using drives 1 and 5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this the expected behavior?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FWIW, the drive/bay numbering is as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 3 5&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 6&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note the above disk numbering only matches the bay number if you have the FIBRE_SCSI V0200 patch (or later?) installed, otherwise the disk number matches the SCSI numbering.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The SCSI numbering is as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4 6 0&lt;BR /&gt;5 7 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, it seems strange to me that MSA$UTIL is not doing what I asked it to do.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas/pointers?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ken Randell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-20T16:25:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA$UTIL using arbitrary drives on SB40c for RAID set</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/msa-util-using-arbitrary-drives-on-sb40c-for-raid-set/m-p/4255355#M15108</link>
      <description>BL860c, VMS 8.3-1H1 w/Fibre_SCSC V0200 patch, SB40c w/6 146GB SAS drives, MSA$UTIL V3.00 build 05-Apr-2008&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm testing some 'what if' scenarios for creating logical units on a SB40c.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My script does the following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$mcr msa$util&lt;BR /&gt;set controller pkb0:&lt;BR /&gt;add unit 0 /disk=(1,2) /raid=1&lt;BR /&gt;add unit 1 /disk=(3,4) /raid=1&lt;BR /&gt;etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, when I remove the drive from bay 2 (my 'what if' scenario), instead of the above add unit 0 command failing as I would expect, MSA$UTIL happily creates the unit using drives 1 and 5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this the expected behavior?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FWIW, the drive/bay numbering is as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 3 5&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 6&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note the above disk numbering only matches the bay number if you have the FIBRE_SCSI V0200 patch (or later?) installed, otherwise the disk number matches the SCSI numbering.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The SCSI numbering is as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4 6 0&lt;BR /&gt;5 7 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, it seems strange to me that MSA$UTIL is not doing what I asked it to do.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas/pointers?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/msa-util-using-arbitrary-drives-on-sb40c-for-raid-set/m-p/4255355#M15108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Randell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-20T16:25:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

