<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: apparent change in behaviour of $DEVICE_SCAN on V8.2 in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894511#M20851</link>
    <description>This change must have taken place between V7.3-2 and V8.2.  The difference is that&lt;BR /&gt;dev$v_nnm in ucb$l_devchar2 is NOT set for V8.2.  I assume this is true for both Alpha and I64, although I've only checked this on an Alpha.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-05T10:21:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>apparent change in behaviour of $DEVICE_SCAN on V8.2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894510#M20850</link>
      <description>This DCL fragment returns device names in the form _nodename$MBAxx: on VMS V7.3, and V6.2 but on VMS V8.2 it returns _MBAxx:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$!                                                           &lt;BR /&gt;$L1:                                                         &lt;BR /&gt;$ dev = F$DEVICE_SCAN("_*MBA*:")                             &lt;BR /&gt;$ IF dev .EQS. "" THEN GOTO END                              &lt;BR /&gt;$ SHOW SYM dev                                               &lt;BR /&gt;$ GOTO L1                                                    &lt;BR /&gt;$END:                                                        &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a known feature? All the nodes have SCSNODE setup.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:33:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894510#M20850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-05T08:33:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: apparent change in behaviour of $DEVICE_SCAN on V8.2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894511#M20851</link>
      <description>This change must have taken place between V7.3-2 and V8.2.  The difference is that&lt;BR /&gt;dev$v_nnm in ucb$l_devchar2 is NOT set for V8.2.  I assume this is true for both Alpha and I64, although I've only checked this on an Alpha.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894511#M20851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Brooks_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-05T10:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: apparent change in behaviour of $DEVICE_SCAN on V8.2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894512#M20852</link>
      <description>Ian,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DEV$V_NNM is also clear on I64 E8.2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;May this have something to do with support for mailbox units numbers greater 9999 starting in V7.3-2 ? To save space in mailbox device name strings ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894512#M20852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-05T10:49:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: apparent change in behaviour of $DEVICE_SCAN on V8.2</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894513#M20853</link>
      <description>I think the change in device characteristics explains what I'm seeing.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/apparent-change-in-behaviour-of-device-scan-on-v8-2/m-p/4894513#M20853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-05T12:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

