<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: why udp recv slowly in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547540#M49221</link>
    <description>Yes,I know UDP without delivery guarantee,but my network card is 1000M,and I am sure this send rate is not fast,so I want to tune my machine to receive all udp data.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tianbinraindrop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-20T06:24:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547532#M49213</link>
      <description>My openvms's version is 7.3-1.I have a multithread program to receive udp data.I find my program will lost some data when one computer sends 100 frames/second to my server.My server is ds25,and has a 1000M network card.Who can tell me how to fix this problem? Thank  you</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 21:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547532#M49213</guid>
      <dc:creator>tianbinraindrop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-18T21:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547533#M49214</link>
      <description>1st advice would be to read the tuning manual at &lt;A href="http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/732final/documentation/pdf/aa-rn1vb-te.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/732final/documentation/pdf/aa-rn1vb-te.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards Kalle</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 00:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547533#M49214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Rohwedder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T00:19:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547534#M49215</link>
      <description>If you don't like reading, try increasing the buffers with ucx set prot udp/quo.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Make sure that the receiving process is not a low priority process.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 01:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547534#M49215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T01:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547535#M49216</link>
      <description>Thank you very much.I want to know what's mean of "ucx set pro/quo"? Wheater use qio is better than use socket?How much receiver buffer is best?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 09:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547535#M49216</guid>
      <dc:creator>tianbinraindrop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T09:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547536#M49217</link>
      <description>A bit more information about&lt;BR /&gt;"ucx set prot udp/quo"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Display current values&lt;BR /&gt;$ TCPIP SHOW PROTOCOL UDP&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ TCPIP SET PROTOCOL UDP/QUOTA=REC:x&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To increase receive quota to x</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 10:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547536#M49217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T10:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547537#M49218</link>
      <description>Simply start with the receive value you have (default is 9K) and double it, test performance, double it, test until the loss of packets is acceptable or until you notice that it doesn't help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It may also be a question of quotas. Check if your process is not bouncing with certain limits (sh proc/quo or use ana/sys).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or do wath Karl instructed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 10:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547537#M49218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T10:50:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547538#M49219</link>
      <description>Thank you.I will try!&lt;BR /&gt;I want to know whether the efficiency of QIO is better than standard socket?By the way,I want to know how to implement semaphore in openvms 7.3-1?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 19:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547538#M49219</guid>
      <dc:creator>tianbinraindrop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-19T19:54:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547539#M49220</link>
      <description>Hm. You do understand that UDP is a datagramm service with NO delivery guarantee, whatever you do to try to tune your machine?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need a guarateed delivery I am afraid you have to switch to another mechanism or develop one on your own.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 01:18:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547539#M49220</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-20T01:18:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547540#M49221</link>
      <description>Yes,I know UDP without delivery guarantee,but my network card is 1000M,and I am sure this send rate is not fast,so I want to tune my machine to receive all udp data.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547540#M49221</guid>
      <dc:creator>tianbinraindrop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-20T06:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547541#M49222</link>
      <description>"I want to know whether the efficiency of QIO is better than standard socket?"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't think there will be much difference. sockets are layered on QIO&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;QIO allows asyncronous operation - sockets don't (without doing threads etc)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 07:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547541#M49222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-20T07:36:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547542#M49223</link>
      <description>If you have multithread program you could use socket interface so your software is more portable. QIO is not quicker than socket interface.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Antonio Vigliotti&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 08:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547542#M49223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antoniov.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-20T08:37:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why udp recv slowly</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547543#M49224</link>
      <description>100 frames per second doesn't even generate 0.2 MB per second. I would say that your program isn't following (thus the frames are received and the receive buffer is full and frames are lost) or may be the router in between isn't following (and he is dropping the fragments).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Post the output of ucx sho prot&lt;BR /&gt;for further analyzing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 04:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/why-udp-recv-slowly/m-p/3547543#M49224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-23T04:44:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

