<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TCPIP ftp problems in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715324#M51228</link>
    <description>Tanja,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if there is some node doing port scans on your FTP server, this could certainly explain your FTP performance problems. TCPIP$INETACP may be busy creating and deleting those BG devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ask your network guys to trace IP network traffic to your node and find out, where those port scans are coming from.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-24T05:15:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715319#M51223</link>
      <description>Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;I'm new here.&lt;BR /&gt;I am running OpenVMS 7.2-1 with TCPIP Services version 5.0a ECO 3 on a Alphaserver 1000 2/266&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is that ftp is behaving inconsistently.&lt;BR /&gt;Some time it works OK, some time it needs long time to connect or work.&lt;BR /&gt;When it works slowly, same behavior shows when trying ftp locally on server.&lt;BR /&gt;Telnet works OK whole time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ ftp tango&lt;BR /&gt;220 tango.tkczag.ht.hr FTP Server (Version 5.0) Ready.&lt;BR /&gt;--- waiting 30 second&lt;BR /&gt;Connected to TANGO.TKCZAG.HT.HR. &lt;BR /&gt;----- waiting 67 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;Name (TANGO.TKCZAG.HT.HR:tanja): &lt;BR /&gt;331 Username tanja requires a Password&lt;BR /&gt;--- waiting 28 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;Password: &lt;BR /&gt;------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ TCPIP show dev &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;shows:&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1052 STREAM   21      0 FTP 0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1207 STREAM   21   3629 FTP TANJA_PC&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1229 STREAM   21   2808 FTP 192.168.28.78&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1239 STREAM   21  42085 FTP 192.168.115.103&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1251 STREAM   21  56811 FTP 172.31.27.220&lt;BR /&gt;  bg1258 DGRAM  1230      0     0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  bg6035 STREAM   21  38308 FTP 192.168.80.69&lt;BR /&gt;  bg6072 STREAM   20  38367     192.168.80.69&lt;BR /&gt;  bg8928 STREAM    0      0     0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  bg9164 STREAM    0      0     0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Devices bg9164, bg 8928  belong to ftp proces:&lt;BR /&gt;$ ucx show dev bg9164/ful&lt;BR /&gt;Device_socket: bg9164      &lt;BR /&gt;Type: STREAM  LOCAL               REMOTE&lt;BR /&gt;   Port:         0                    0&lt;BR /&gt;   Host:     0.0.0.0             0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;   Service:                       &lt;BR /&gt;           &lt;BR /&gt;                                                                           RECEIVE       SEND&lt;BR /&gt;Queued I/O                    0             0&lt;BR /&gt;Socket buffer bytes           0            22&lt;BR /&gt;Socket buffer quota       33580         33580&lt;BR /&gt;Total buffer alloc            0           512&lt;BR /&gt;Total buffer limit       268640        268640&lt;BR /&gt;Buffer or I/O waits           0             0&lt;BR /&gt;Buffer or I/O drops           0             0&lt;BR /&gt;I/O completed                 3             3&lt;BR /&gt;Bytes transferred            28           120&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;       Q0LEN         0     &lt;BR /&gt;       QLEN          0 &lt;BR /&gt;       QLIMIT        0 &lt;BR /&gt;       TIMEO         0 &lt;BR /&gt;       ERROR        54&lt;BR /&gt;       OOBMARK       0&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;                                   &lt;BR /&gt;  Options:  REUSEADR OOBINLINE&lt;BR /&gt;  State:    CANTSENDMORE CANTRECVMORE PRIV&lt;BR /&gt;  RCV Buff: None&lt;BR /&gt;  SND Buff: None&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All help appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards &lt;BR /&gt;Tanja&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715319#M51223</guid>
      <dc:creator>tanja_6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-23T08:37:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715320#M51224</link>
      <description>Just a guess, maybe the FTP server process has timed out. So when receiving a new connection request, the INETD has to start a new FTP server process (1st wait). The FTP server process then starts a child process to handle your transfer (2nd wait).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I remember correctly, the FTP server process can be told to not time out (via a logical name?). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also have a look into your systemwide loginfiles, if on network mode the normal interactive things are skipped (IF F$MODE().eqs. "NETWORK" THEN $EXIT)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards Kalle</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715320#M51224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl Rohwedder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-23T10:13:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715321#M51225</link>
      <description>Tanja,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;welcome to the OpenVMS ITRC forum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FTP can be sensitive to DNS lookup problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does UCX SHOW NAME list multiple BIND servers ? Do they work o.k., when you see your FTP problem ? You could test this with TCPIP$NSLOOKUP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715321#M51225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-23T10:46:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715322#M51226</link>
      <description>Tanja,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also check your network infrastructure. Telnet produces effectivly zero load on the network.I have seen situations where infrastructure problems (e.g., full/half duplex mismatches) did not show up when using telnet (or DECnet SET HOST), but did show up severly whenusing FTP or DECnet COPYs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Bob Gezelter, &lt;A href="http://www.rlgsc.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.rlgsc.com&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715322#M51226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Gezelter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-23T11:18:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715323#M51227</link>
      <description>This server is used as ftp server in our environment for 5 years on this software level, and severe problems with ftp are reported last month.&lt;BR /&gt;My network guys claim that problem is on server which fits with problems with local ftp on server. There are times when ftp works fast for hours, but this week we have big problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the main thing that I observed is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if ftp is not working properly, there exists device like &lt;BR /&gt; bg2399      DGRAM     2139       0                   0.0.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;where device number grows and local port number grows, as if something is scanning ports.&lt;BR /&gt;When there are no such devices, ftp work OK.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715323#M51227</guid>
      <dc:creator>tanja_6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-24T04:11:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP ftp problems</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715324#M51228</link>
      <description>Tanja,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if there is some node doing port scans on your FTP server, this could certainly explain your FTP performance problems. TCPIP$INETACP may be busy creating and deleting those BG devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ask your network guys to trace IP network traffic to your node and find out, where those port scans are coming from.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Volker.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-ftp-problems/m-p/3715324#M51228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker Halle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-24T05:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

