<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985963#M52454</link>
    <description>Some of us are hobbyists and ineligible for support from HP.  It so happens that I work for a company that provides OpenVMS-based solutions, but IMAP is not a product we sell or support so I felt it would be inappropriate to use our HP support resources to troubleshoot my hobbyist's issue.  At least if I post issues like these in the forum, there's a chance someone at HP might accidentally see them.  IMAP has been broken since 5.4 ECO 4, so OpenVMS engineering obviously is not aware.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-26T20:53:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985959#M52450</link>
      <description>The TCPIP 5.5 IMAP server is unstable even with only two users on the system.  It crashes repeatedly with even one user attached.  The SYSTEM mailbox is clogged with messages like these: &lt;BR /&gt;---------------&lt;BR /&gt;From:   TCPIP$IMAP  &lt;BR /&gt;To:     SYSTEM&lt;BR /&gt;CC:&lt;BR /&gt;Subj:   JSBACH - %SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=!XB, virtual address=!XH, PC=!XH, PS=!XL&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The TCP/IP IMAP server has experienced a runtime error.  The reason&lt;BR /&gt;for the error should appear on the subject line of this message.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please investigate this problem as quickly as possible.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Here is the TCPIP$IMAP account.  Careful reading, rereading, and rerereading has not revealed to me whether any of these settings could possibly be insufficient on a two-user mail system:&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Username: TCPIP$IMAP                       Owner:  TCPIP$IMAP&lt;BR /&gt;Account:  TCPIP                            UIC:    [3655,11] ([TCPIP$AUX,TCPIP$IMAP])&lt;BR /&gt;CLI:      DCL                              Tables: DCLTABLES&lt;BR /&gt;Default:  SYS$SYSDEVICE:[TCPIP$IMAP]&lt;BR /&gt;LGICMD:   LOGIN&lt;BR /&gt;Flags:  Restricted&lt;BR /&gt;Primary days:   Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri        &lt;BR /&gt;Secondary days:                     Sat Sun&lt;BR /&gt;Primary   000000000011111111112222  Secondary 000000000011111111112222&lt;BR /&gt;Day Hours 012345678901234567890123  Day Hours 012345678901234567890123&lt;BR /&gt;Network:  ##### Full access ######            ##### Full access ######&lt;BR /&gt;Batch:    -----  No access  ------            -----  No access  ------&lt;BR /&gt;Local:    -----  No access  ------            -----  No access  ------&lt;BR /&gt;Dialup:   -----  No access  ------            -----  No access  ------&lt;BR /&gt;Remote:   -----  No access  ------            -----  No access  ------&lt;BR /&gt;Expiration:            (none)    Pwdminimum:  6   Login Fails:     0&lt;BR /&gt;Pwdlifetime:         90 00:00    Pwdchange:      (pre-expired) &lt;BR /&gt;Last Login:            (none) (interactive), 17-JUN-2006 23:44 (non-interactive)&lt;BR /&gt;Maxjobs:         0  Fillm:      1100  Bytlm:       700000&lt;BR /&gt;Maxacctjobs:     0  Shrfillm:      0  Pbytlm:           0&lt;BR /&gt;Maxdetach:       0  BIOlm:      2048  JTquota:       4096&lt;BR /&gt;Prclm:           8  DIOlm:      1024  WSdef:        20000&lt;BR /&gt;Prio:            6  ASTlm:      2448  WSquo:        40000&lt;BR /&gt;Queprio:         4  TQElm:        20  WSextent:     40000&lt;BR /&gt;CPU:        (none)  Enqlm:      3000  Pgflquo:     850000&lt;BR /&gt;Authorized Privileges: &lt;BR /&gt;  NETMBX       TMPMBX&lt;BR /&gt;Default Privileges: &lt;BR /&gt;  NETMBX       TMPMBX&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The run log looks like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------&lt;BR /&gt;$ Set NoOn&lt;BR /&gt;$ VERIFY = F$VERIFY(F$TRNLNM("SYLOGIN_VERIFY"))&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP-I-IMAPSTART, Server starting.&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP-I-IMAPIDENT, IMAP Server V5.3-RG40&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP-I-IMAPRUN, Server running.&lt;BR /&gt;%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=00000000007AE42B, PC=00000000000DFAB4, PS=0000001B&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.&lt;BR /&gt;    Signal arguments:   Number = 0000000000000005&lt;BR /&gt;                        Name   = 000000000000000C&lt;BR /&gt;                                 0000000000000000&lt;BR /&gt;                                 00000000007AE42B&lt;BR /&gt;                                 00000000000DFAB4&lt;BR /&gt;                                 000000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    Register dump:&lt;BR /&gt;    R0  = 00000000007ADF28  R1  = 0000000000000001  R2  = 000000000002FEB0&lt;BR /&gt;    R3  = 00000000007ADF28  R4  = 0000000000038A98  R5  = 0000000000000016&lt;BR /&gt;    R6  = FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF  R7  = 0000000000000000  R8  = 0000000000000003&lt;BR /&gt;    R9  = 0000000000000002  R10 = 0000000000000001  R11 = 0000000000792750&lt;BR /&gt;    R12 = 000000000004A570  R13 = 000000000004C800  R14 = 000000000079274C&lt;BR /&gt;    R15 = 0000000000000000  R16 = 00000000007ADF28  R17 = 00000000000389F8&lt;BR /&gt;    R18 = 000000000004D798  R19 = 000000007359A5DD  R20 = 0000000000000001&lt;BR /&gt;    R21 = 0000000000000000  R22 = 00000000F00D0001  R23 = 00000003DB380280&lt;BR /&gt;    R24 = FFFFFFFFF00D5A01  R25 = 0000000000000002  R26 = 000000000004D798&lt;BR /&gt;    R27 = 0000000000000000  R28 = FFFFFFFF80A65560  R29 = 000000000137EE60&lt;BR /&gt;    SP  = 000000000137EE60  PC  = 00000000000DFAB4  PS  = 200000000000001B&lt;BR /&gt;%SET-W-NOMSG, Message number 007769A8&lt;BR /&gt;  TCPIP$IMAP   job terminated at 17-JUN-2006 23:45:43.20&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Accounting information:&lt;BR /&gt;  Buffered I/O count:               5156      Peak working set size:      29632&lt;BR /&gt;  Direct I/O count:                 7170      Peak virtual size:         208032&lt;BR /&gt;  Page faults:                      2672      Mounted volumes:                0&lt;BR /&gt;  Charged CPU time:        0 00:00:03.55      Elapsed time:       0 00:04:35.51&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have tried enabling trace, but it doesn't even indicate when these crashes occur.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Even when the server doesn't crash entirely, it is very unstable.  My best interpretation of the documentation is that the server has memory leaks and has been patched to work around them by periodically creating new processes.  It seems that when it does this, it silently stops communicating with the client for "up to five seconds."  Mozilla Thunderbird does not like this and sometimes either fails to refresh a folder or shows a blank folder.  Twiddling Max-Connections from 25 to 50 to 100 to 10 and even 1 doesn't make a difference other than making the glitches change slightly in frequency.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IMAP also creates new versions of emails-- emails which have not been modified by the user.  This causes the email directory to become more cluttered and IMAP even slower (and it is already quite slow with more than 40 or 50 messages in a folder).  I must periodically purge these files, which can number in the hundreds within a month.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there anything I can do to get basic stability out of this product, or should I move to the byzantine but allegedly stable PMDF?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985959#M52450</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-17T23:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985960#M52451</link>
      <description>I have ECO 1 installed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Research into older threads finds that IMAP broke in one of the 5.4 ECOs, but I can't even download any of the earlier 5.4 ECOs from anywhere and use the image just to see if it works.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985960#M52451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-17T23:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985961#M52452</link>
      <description>I had ths same problem as well but I got some a special image that has fixed the crashing and stability problem.  As far as the creating new message I am not aware of that.  If you like I can send you my image.  I am also running tcpip 5.5 with ECO1 and the image is a patch for that version.  &lt;BR /&gt;Just send my a note: jabraga &lt;BR /&gt;atsign flanagan dot ca</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 05:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985961#M52452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Alan Braga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-19T05:43:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985962#M52453</link>
      <description>Jerry,&lt;BR /&gt;  Please don't forward engineering "hotfix" images to others. They haven't been through the normal QA processes and the intention is that engineering and services can track where they are in case problems are discovered.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Treat them like a prescription drug. By all means refer someone you think may have the same symptom to the doctor who prescribed it to you, but please don't just give them your treatment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Stephen, to have your symptom diagnosed, and possibly obtain the same image as described by Jerry (or maybe a different one tailored to your circumstances), please log a case with your local customer support centre.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985962#M52453</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-20T17:49:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TCPIP 5.5 IMAP Server nonexistent stability</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985963#M52454</link>
      <description>Some of us are hobbyists and ineligible for support from HP.  It so happens that I work for a company that provides OpenVMS-based solutions, but IMAP is not a product we sell or support so I felt it would be inappropriate to use our HP support resources to troubleshoot my hobbyist's issue.  At least if I post issues like these in the forum, there's a chance someone at HP might accidentally see them.  IMAP has been broken since 5.4 ECO 4, so OpenVMS engineering obviously is not aware.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/tcpip-5-5-imap-server-nonexistent-stability/m-p/4985963#M52454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Eickhoff_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-26T20:53:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

