<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DNS with 2 servers in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180799#M56396</link>
    <description>Just sharing my finding. VMS 7.3 with TCP 5.3 eco 2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you use BIND DNS with multiple servers, it will wait the configured 'timeout' seconds before contacting the next specifified server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On my site timeout was 4 seconds. To improve failover, I changed it to 1 and increased the retries. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note that a program can decide to overrule this timeout.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fwiw&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-16T08:07:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DNS with 2 servers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180799#M56396</link>
      <description>Just sharing my finding. VMS 7.3 with TCP 5.3 eco 2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you use BIND DNS with multiple servers, it will wait the configured 'timeout' seconds before contacting the next specifified server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On my site timeout was 4 seconds. To improve failover, I changed it to 1 and increased the retries. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note that a program can decide to overrule this timeout.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fwiw&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180799#M56396</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-16T08:07:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS with 2 servers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180800#M56397</link>
      <description>Wim,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;it will wait the configured 'timeout' &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;seconds before contacting the next &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;specifified server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Are you surprised? That's how DNS works on all systems. How could it be any other way?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Beware. Reducing the timeout too far can cause problems of its own. Consider, if it were a universally good idea to have a 1 second timeout, that would be the default! The people who define these things aren't completely stupid.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180800#M56397</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-16T21:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS with 2 servers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180801#M56398</link>
      <description>John,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;May be the 4 seconds is default value of long time ago.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note that with 1 second and retries enabled, it will switch between the 2 addreses while retrying.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note that ucx help set nam/time suggest that it would take 1 minutes to timeout. This is not correct because with 1 address it took 90 seconds on my config (after 1 minute it tried again after 64, 72 and 88 seconds.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm even surprised that values smaller than 1 second are not allowed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180801#M56398</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-21T05:58:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DNS with 2 servers</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180802#M56399</link>
      <description>Did a test to see how it reacts with 2 DNS servers that are down. Timeout is 1, tries is 6.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will show offset in seconds and to which server the DNS request is Xmitted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;0 X1&lt;BR /&gt;1 X2&lt;BR /&gt;2 X1&lt;BR /&gt;3 X2&lt;BR /&gt;4 X1&lt;BR /&gt;6 X2&lt;BR /&gt;8 X1&lt;BR /&gt;12 X2&lt;BR /&gt;16 X1&lt;BR /&gt;24 X2&lt;BR /&gt;32 X1&lt;BR /&gt;48 X2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;64 X1&lt;BR /&gt;65 X2&lt;BR /&gt;66 X1&lt;BR /&gt;67 X2&lt;BR /&gt;68 X1&lt;BR /&gt;70 X2&lt;BR /&gt;72 X1&lt;BR /&gt;76 X2&lt;BR /&gt;80 X1&lt;BR /&gt;86 X2&lt;BR /&gt;94 X1&lt;BR /&gt;110 X2&lt;BR /&gt;End.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you can see, after 1 second the retransmit was done to the failover.  Then the doubling the timeout continued for the X1. Exactly between every 2 X1, an X2 is done. Until the 7th retry. And then it restarts but not with exactly the same timings.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IMO a better solution than the default one (network with nodes maximum 10 km appart, no internet).&lt;BR /&gt;The default reacted as&lt;BR /&gt;0 X1&lt;BR /&gt;4 X2&lt;BR /&gt;8 X1&lt;BR /&gt;12 X2&lt;BR /&gt;...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fwiw&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dns-with-2-servers/m-p/4180802#M56399</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-21T07:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

