<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic sftp issues in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536380#M58837</link>
    <description>Does anyone know if sftp is going to act like a native vms utility instead of a nix port in future releases ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some examples &lt;BR /&gt;-Case sensitive &lt;BR /&gt;-No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd ect&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These are not a big deal, but it can get annoying at certain times. &lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here are some issues i encounter using sftp. I do not know if some settings are wrong but i am confused on the way sftp handles some requests. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All these examples are between the following two machines.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Client - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6&lt;BR /&gt;Server - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6- eco 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have two system logicals set up on the server side.&lt;BR /&gt;"FIX" = "DQB0:[FIX]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)&lt;BR /&gt;"BAS" = "DQB0:[BAS]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The protections/ownerships on the directories are the same. I am using a privileged account on both machines.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd fix&lt;BR /&gt;DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd bas&lt;BR /&gt;CD failed.&lt;BR /&gt;DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can access the bas logical using the full path.&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd dqb0:[bas]&lt;BR /&gt;dqb0:[bas]&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also seem to have an 'ls' issue&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(VMS dir command)&lt;BR /&gt;Directory DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;T.T;6               T.T;5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(sftp ls command)&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls fix:t.t&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The ls command, after thinking for a while just returns me back to the sftp prompt&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also can not issue a get/put using a logical. I have to change to the directory i want to get/put from/to. Is this a sftp security feature ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; get fix:t.t&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:362: File is "raw", and it needs to be parsed.&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:297: Received error `syserr: no such file or direc.&lt;BR /&gt;fcr_parse_raw: fix/fix:t.t (src): no such file (server msg: 'syserr: no such fi)&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCTransfer/SSHFC_TRANSFER.C:2321: File list has 0 files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This throws a file not found error, when i know the file exists. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It would be nice to be able to use logicals like you can in ftp.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example:&lt;BR /&gt;ftp&amp;gt;get logical:file.ext logical:file.ext&lt;BR /&gt;Works on ftp where it doesn't on sftp&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason_429</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T20:23:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>sftp issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536380#M58837</link>
      <description>Does anyone know if sftp is going to act like a native vms utility instead of a nix port in future releases ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some examples &lt;BR /&gt;-Case sensitive &lt;BR /&gt;-No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd ect&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These are not a big deal, but it can get annoying at certain times. &lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here are some issues i encounter using sftp. I do not know if some settings are wrong but i am confused on the way sftp handles some requests. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All these examples are between the following two machines.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Client - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6&lt;BR /&gt;Server - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6- eco 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have two system logicals set up on the server side.&lt;BR /&gt;"FIX" = "DQB0:[FIX]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)&lt;BR /&gt;"BAS" = "DQB0:[BAS]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The protections/ownerships on the directories are the same. I am using a privileged account on both machines.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd fix&lt;BR /&gt;DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd bas&lt;BR /&gt;CD failed.&lt;BR /&gt;DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can access the bas logical using the full path.&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; cd dqb0:[bas]&lt;BR /&gt;dqb0:[bas]&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also seem to have an 'ls' issue&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(VMS dir command)&lt;BR /&gt;Directory DQB0:[FIX]&lt;BR /&gt;T.T;6               T.T;5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(sftp ls command)&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls fix:t.t&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The ls command, after thinking for a while just returns me back to the sftp prompt&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also can not issue a get/put using a logical. I have to change to the directory i want to get/put from/to. Is this a sftp security feature ? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; get fix:t.t&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:362: File is "raw", and it needs to be parsed.&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:297: Received error `syserr: no such file or direc.&lt;BR /&gt;fcr_parse_raw: fix/fix:t.t (src): no such file (server msg: 'syserr: no such fi)&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCTransfer/SSHFC_TRANSFER.C:2321: File list has 0 files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This throws a file not found error, when i know the file exists. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It would be nice to be able to use logicals like you can in ftp.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example:&lt;BR /&gt;ftp&amp;gt;get logical:file.ext logical:file.ext&lt;BR /&gt;Works on ftp where it doesn't on sftp&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536380#M58837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_429</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T20:23:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sftp issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536381#M58838</link>
      <description>Jason,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Log a case with your local customer support centre, requesting enhancements.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but the way HP seems to be treating OpenVMS these days, I wouldn't hold my breath :-(</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536381#M58838</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T21:13:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sftp issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536382#M58839</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt; Does anyone know if sftp is going to act&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; like a native vms utility instead of a nix&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; port in future releases ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Of the future, it's hard to be certain, but&lt;BR /&gt;my money would be on it continuing to act&lt;BR /&gt;like what it is, namely UNIX software ported&lt;BR /&gt;(none too well) to VMS.  My favorite:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alp $ sftp alp-l&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;@ SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.TXT&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; -No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; ect&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That's "etc.", as in "et cetera".  In old&lt;BR /&gt;books, where people still knew what they were&lt;BR /&gt;abbreviating, you may see "et c.", which I&lt;BR /&gt;find charming.  In the race for most&lt;BR /&gt;annoying, it's a tie between people who say&lt;BR /&gt;"eck cetera" and people who say "and et&lt;BR /&gt;cetera".  ("And eck cetera" beats both of&lt;BR /&gt;those, of course.)  But I digress.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've given up, and adapted.  I don't know why&lt;BR /&gt;your apparently similar "fix" and "bas" don't&lt;BR /&gt;behave the same, but I have no obvious&lt;BR /&gt;trouble when I use UNIX-like path notation.&lt;BR /&gt;For example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ALP $ show logical /system aftp*&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  "AFTP" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS]"&lt;BR /&gt;  "AFTP_ROOT" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS.]"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l /aftp/announce.txt&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x   1 4        1              41 Mar 12  2005 ANNOUNCE.TXT;2*&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l /aftp_root/info-zip/os.sh&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x   1 4        1            1936 Apr  5  0:34 OS.SH;2*&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When (imprisoned) in Rome, ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't expect VMS file specs to work in this&lt;BR /&gt;environment, so I don't even try.  Call me&lt;BR /&gt;fatalistic.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-issues/m-p/4536382#M58839</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-19T04:07:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

