<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589630#M59256</link>
    <description>This is what I get for trying to get a quick answer.  Had I examined the release notes for the ECO, I would have found my answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Corrections for HP TCP/IP Services V5.6 SSH, SCP and SFTP Components&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;ECO 1 updates&lt;BR /&gt;-------------&lt;BR /&gt;Alpha and IA64&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Problem:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        The "ls -l" command in SFTP was not working.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Deliverables:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        All SSH images&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Reference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        PTR 70-5-2758 (part 2)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I loaded the ECO and it fixed it, as expected.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharlieCalhoun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-02T23:04:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589626#M59252</link>
      <description>I have two 8.3 OpenVMS nodes.  1 production and the other development.  Production is running TCPIP 5.6 ECO2 and development is running 5.6 without any ECO's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I issue the same command from each system, production returns the results as expected, development does not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On production, the directory list appears similar to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l&lt;BR /&gt;drwxrwxrwx   1 SVC_DUB 1536        19968 Feb 12  8:49 INBOX.DIR;1/&lt;BR /&gt;drwxrwxrwx   1 SVC_DUB 1536          512 Feb 17 17:15 OUTBOX.DIR;1/&lt;BR /&gt;drwxr-xr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536          512 Jan 18  2008 SSH2.DIR;1/&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         1164 Dec 29  2008 TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;3*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         1164 Mar 31  2009 TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;4*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         1164 Feb  3 16:38 TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;5*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         1164 Feb  4 14:47 TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;6*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         1164 Feb 17 16:41 TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;7*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536          112 Jan  5 15:39 TCPIP$SSH_SFTP-SERVER2.LOG;1*&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxrwxr-x   1 SVC_DUB 1536         6656 Jan  6 21:22 TCPIP$SSH_SFTP-SERVER2.LOG;2*&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On development, the directory list appears similar to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l&lt;BR /&gt;INBOX.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;OUTBOX.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;SSH2.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;1&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;2&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;3&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;4&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;5&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;6&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$SSH_SFTP-SERVER2.LOG;1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've examined the ssh2_config. and sshd2_config. files between the two nodes and they are identical (default).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surely any symbol definition in the login.com would have no effect on this procedure.  There is a symbol definition for the account on the prod side, but not the dev side.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Am I finding something that was resolved in ECO2?  Any other reason why my development box isn't returning the detailed list?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Charlie</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589626#M59252</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieCalhoun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-23T21:57:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589627#M59253</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Surely any symbol definition in the login.com would have no effect on this procedure. There is a symbol definition for the account on the prod side, but not the dev side.&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess we need to see the symbol definition.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On production, the directory list appears similar to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is this?  Is this some unspecified ssh client asking production for ls -l?  Or production asking some unspecified ssh server for ls -l?  Same question for your other example.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And regardless of whether the unspecified entity is client or server, what is it?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589627#M59253</guid>
      <dc:creator>RBrown_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-23T22:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589628#M59254</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Sure looks as if someone doesn't understand&lt;BR /&gt;"-l".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; I've examined the ssh2_config. and&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; sshd2_config. files [...]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of them?  System-wide and personal?  A&lt;BR /&gt;user can have a configuration file in his&lt;BR /&gt;own SYS$LOGIN:[.SSH2] directory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Time to throw a "-v" (or "-vv", or more) onto&lt;BR /&gt;the SFTP command(s)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; Production is running TCPIP 5.6 ECO2 and&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; development is running 5.6 without any&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; ECO's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP is normally lame enough _with_ the&lt;BR /&gt;latest ECO.  Around here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alp $ tcpip show version&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  HP TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.6 - ECO 4&lt;BR /&gt;  on a COMPAQ Professional Workstation XP1000 running OpenVMS V8.3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd certainly try it again with something&lt;BR /&gt;newer than _no_ ECO.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589628#M59254</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-23T22:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589629#M59255</link>
      <description>The symbol definition is&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ dir:=="direc/width=file:75/date=cr"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I defined it on the development system where it isn't returning expected results and no change in the results were experienced.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;WHAT is="" this=""&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The VMS boxes are the server side.  The connection is initiated by a client.  The customer is coming from HP-UX, but the same behavior is seen using the VMS sftp client commands as well going from one VMS box to another.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;SURE looks="" as="" if="" someone="" doesn=""&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The process is trying to examine the file size of the files in the directory and bypass 0 block files in the automated process using sftp.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; I've examined the ssh2_config. and&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; sshd2_config. files [...]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of them?  System-wide and personal?  A&lt;BR /&gt;user can have a configuration file in his&lt;BR /&gt;own SYS$LOGIN:[.SSH2] directory.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, all of them.  I looked at the system files and there are no config files in the user's own [.ssh2] directory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I threw in a -vv and here are the results.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; ls -l&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:398: File is "raw", and it needs to be parsed.&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;INBOX.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;OUTBOX.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;SSH2.DIR;1&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;8&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;7&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;6&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;5&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;4&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;3&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;2&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$FTP_SERVER.LOG;1&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;TCPIP$SSH_SFTP-SERVER2.LOG;1&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:331: Received error `EOF' (1).&lt;BR /&gt;sftp&amp;gt; debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 2 to connec&lt;BR /&gt;tion&lt;BR /&gt;debug: Ssh2Transport/TRCOMMON.C:1105: Sending packet with type 94 to connection&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SURE&gt;&lt;/WHAT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589629#M59255</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieCalhoun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T16:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SFTP LS -L returns different view between 2 nodes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589630#M59256</link>
      <description>This is what I get for trying to get a quick answer.  Had I examined the release notes for the ECO, I would have found my answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Corrections for HP TCP/IP Services V5.6 SSH, SCP and SFTP Components&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;ECO 1 updates&lt;BR /&gt;-------------&lt;BR /&gt;Alpha and IA64&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Problem:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        The "ls -l" command in SFTP was not working.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Deliverables:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        All SSH images&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        Reference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        PTR 70-5-2758 (part 2)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I loaded the ECO and it fixed it, as expected.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/sftp-ls-l-returns-different-view-between-2-nodes/m-p/4589630#M59256</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieCalhoun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-02T23:04:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

