<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OpenVMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6-9 The getaddrinfo socket api function not always filling scope id for IPv6 in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-8-3-tcpip-v5-6-9-the-getaddrinfo-socket-api-function-not/m-p/4751783#M60330</link>
    <description>I am trying to update an existing socket-based C++ application to be address family independent for IPv6 support using getaddrinfo. However, if I try to lookup a numeric IPv6 address containing a scope reference (fe80::217:8ff:fe7c:6bc0%IE0) on a multi-homed machine it does not populate the sin6_scope_id member of the sockaddr_in6 structure returned in addrinfo when I use the address family hint AF_UNSPEC, but it does if I use AF_INET6. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A Linux implementation always fills in the sin6_scope_id for AF_INET6 responses regardless of whether I specified AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone know if this is something that has been addressed in an ECO? I didn't find anything that talked about scope ids in IPv6 addresses.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nigel Meachen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-11T17:12:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OpenVMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6-9 The getaddrinfo socket api function not always filling scope id for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-8-3-tcpip-v5-6-9-the-getaddrinfo-socket-api-function-not/m-p/4751783#M60330</link>
      <description>I am trying to update an existing socket-based C++ application to be address family independent for IPv6 support using getaddrinfo. However, if I try to lookup a numeric IPv6 address containing a scope reference (fe80::217:8ff:fe7c:6bc0%IE0) on a multi-homed machine it does not populate the sin6_scope_id member of the sockaddr_in6 structure returned in addrinfo when I use the address family hint AF_UNSPEC, but it does if I use AF_INET6. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A Linux implementation always fills in the sin6_scope_id for AF_INET6 responses regardless of whether I specified AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone know if this is something that has been addressed in an ECO? I didn't find anything that talked about scope ids in IPv6 addresses.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-8-3-tcpip-v5-6-9-the-getaddrinfo-socket-api-function-not/m-p/4751783#M60330</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nigel Meachen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-11T17:12:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6-9 The getaddrinfo socket api function not always filling scope id for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-8-3-tcpip-v5-6-9-the-getaddrinfo-socket-api-function-not/m-p/4751784#M60331</link>
      <description>Nigel,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Sounds like this issue is amenable to a very simple reproducer program? I'd build one, show &amp;amp; document the differences you're seeing between operating systems, then log a case with your local customer support centre.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-8-3-tcpip-v5-6-9-the-getaddrinfo-socket-api-function-not/m-p/4751784#M60331</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-13T21:05:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

