<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Preferred Mount - Shadowing in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576467#M6403</link>
    <description>Besides the redundancy advantage you have in general you have to set the preferred ways of your shadowset member disks explicitly (one to controller A and and one to controller B) to take advantage of your environment And this should be done on a regular basis to reset realtime changes after a contoller restart and such things.&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;EW&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eberhard Wacker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-07-05T17:48:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Preferred Mount - Shadowing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576465#M6401</link>
      <description>We have a number of systems with dual-redundant HSx controllers.  The drives on them are Phase II(host based) shadowed.  We usually try to split the shadowset members between controllers.  From a performance standpoint, is it better to have both members of a given shadowset on one controller or have them split between controllers?  Thank you, Chris</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:10:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576465#M6401</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-05T12:10:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preferred Mount - Shadowing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576466#M6402</link>
      <description>Yes, you are on the right track.&lt;BR /&gt;Not only splitting controllers will improve performance, but provide greater redundency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good job.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576466#M6402</guid>
      <dc:creator>comarow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-05T13:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preferred Mount - Shadowing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576467#M6403</link>
      <description>Besides the redundancy advantage you have in general you have to set the preferred ways of your shadowset member disks explicitly (one to controller A and and one to controller B) to take advantage of your environment And this should be done on a regular basis to reset realtime changes after a contoller restart and such things.&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;EW&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/preferred-mount-shadowing/m-p/3576467#M6403</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eberhard Wacker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-07-05T17:48:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

