<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP routing tables version 4.x versus 5.x in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526897#M67925</link>
    <description>We had something similar on our new 7.3-2 system back in 2004, which did cause trouble. We deleted it, but it returned after reboot, until we deleberately deleted all permanent routes and created the (correct) default one.&lt;BR /&gt;I still don't know where it came from...A remainder on installation, perhaps?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(This may have been put into this forum - but I'm not sure)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Willem</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Willem Grooters</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-20T08:04:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP routing tables version 4.x versus 5.x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526895#M67923</link>
      <description>Didn't search for it yet but I noticed that on my TCP 5.x systems I have a route with gateway and destination pointing to the local node.&lt;BR /&gt;This route is not present on my 4.x systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I removed the route and found everything still working as before.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone an idea why this route exists ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wim</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526895#M67923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Van den Wyngaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-18T07:41:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP routing tables version 4.x versus 5.x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526896#M67924</link>
      <description>I guess is a feature of the software ported from unix. I cant find a reference in the documentation.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 05:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526896#M67924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-19T05:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP routing tables version 4.x versus 5.x</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526897#M67925</link>
      <description>We had something similar on our new 7.3-2 system back in 2004, which did cause trouble. We deleted it, but it returned after reboot, until we deleberately deleted all permanent routes and created the (correct) default one.&lt;BR /&gt;I still don't know where it came from...A remainder on installation, perhaps?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(This may have been put into this forum - but I'm not sure)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Willem</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/ip-routing-tables-version-4-x-versus-5-x/m-p/3526897#M67925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Willem Grooters</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-20T08:04:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

