<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OpenVMS SAN Switch connection. in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661257#M72304</link>
    <description>From your description I don't expect any new connections, because the basic connectivity path (Fibre Channel adapter WWN to Controller/Port combination) does not change.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-10-31T12:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OpenVMS SAN Switch connection.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661256#M72303</link>
      <description>We are restructuring the SAN fabrics at one site to increase the ISL's and enable them to be trunked if needed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a (Alpha ES40 OpenVMS) server "10:00:00:00:c9:27:ab:3a"  connected to switch 3 with domain id 81 on port 6.&lt;BR /&gt;We have a HSG "50:00:1f:e1:00:14:94:84" connected to switch 3 with domain id 81 on port 3.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What needs to happen is the server will be move to port 10 on switch 3, and&lt;BR /&gt;the hsg conenction needs to be moved to port 15 on switch 3.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The zoning on the switches is WWID based so we will not need to modify the switch zoning.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However the questions are:&lt;BR /&gt;1) When moving the HSG port from switch 3 port 3 to switch 3 port 15.  Will all the server conn details be different and !newconns generated for each server that uses this hsg.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) When moving the server from port 6 on switch 3 to port 10 would a new conn be generated on the hsg80?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have been told two version.&lt;BR /&gt;Yes You will get a whole load of new conns.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However our network team tell me that this was done on a switch last year and nothing changed in the way of connections. i.e. old connections going offline and !newconns appearing. Has anyone else done this ?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661256#M72303</guid>
      <dc:creator>VMS Support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-31T12:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVMS SAN Switch connection.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661257#M72304</link>
      <description>From your description I don't expect any new connections, because the basic connectivity path (Fibre Channel adapter WWN to Controller/Port combination) does not change.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661257#M72304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-31T12:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenVMS SAN Switch connection.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661258#M72305</link>
      <description>Yes,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;nothing will change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's the wwid data which matters and it's not changing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mike</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:25:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/openvms-san-switch-connection/m-p/3661258#M72305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Reznak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-01T11:25:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

