<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Patch VMS732_ACRTL-V0200 Question/Problem in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950353#M73558</link>
    <description>The reply gave me the info I needed.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Roger_Fraser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-06T03:02:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Patch VMS732_ACRTL-V0200 Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950350#M73555</link>
      <description>Has anyone else had the problem that, after applying this patch, the images SYS$COMMON:[SYSUPD]COMPARE_TIMES.EXE and SYS$COMMON:[SYSUPD]LIBEXT.EXE are missing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interestingly only the LIBEXT.EXE image was saved in the [PCSI$UNDO_*....] tree.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950350#M73555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger_Fraser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-05T08:09:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patch VMS732_ACRTL-V0200 Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950351#M73556</link>
      <description>Hi Roger,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;from what I can see, LIBEXT.EXE is used by the patch UNDO operation to extract headers from the restored DECC$RTLDEF.TLB when undoing the patch. I was unable to locate any copy of COMPARE_TIMES.EXE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I doubt that these images existed in SYSUPD before the patch install. They would likely be placed there during the installation, for use during an UNDO operation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950351#M73556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-05T10:37:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patch VMS732_ACRTL-V0200 Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950352#M73557</link>
      <description>Hi Duncan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply - very useful.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All I can say is that the previous version of this patch left both images behind in [SYSUPD]. However, as it doesn't seem to be causing a problem (so far anyway), I am not going to worry further about it!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950352#M73557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger_Fraser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-05T11:25:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patch VMS732_ACRTL-V0200 Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950353#M73558</link>
      <description>The reply gave me the info I needed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/patch-vms732-acrtl-v0200-question-problem/m-p/4950353#M73558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger_Fraser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-06T03:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

