<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500 in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718764#M74178</link>
    <description>Guy, many thanks for a rapid response and resolution.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-30T09:33:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718754#M74168</link>
      <description>I have discovered a problem with the lexical function F$ENVIRONMENT following the installation of the latest DCL patch for Alpha V7.3-2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since installation a call such as &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BASEDIR = F$ENVIRONMENT ("PROCEDURE")&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;returns a corrupt file spec. The version number is returned as a non-numeric character&lt;BR /&gt;(see attachment). This then causes subsequent F$PARSE operations to fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After de-installing the patch, the correct behaviour returns.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anybody else seen this behaviour?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718754#M74168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T03:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718755#M74169</link>
      <description>Yes !&lt;BR /&gt;If F$ENVIRONMENT("PROCEDURE") returns exactly 30 characters, the last digit of the version number gets corrupted.&lt;BR /&gt;In most cases the last digit  is overwritten by a binary zero, which causes F$PARSE to return a truncated version number. But especially in nested command procedures, I observe arbitrary bit patterns, which let F$PARSE fail completely (i.e. return of zero length strings).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718755#M74169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dr. Richard Glasow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T04:52:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718756#M74170</link>
      <description>Has this already been reported to and/or acknowledged by HP?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Proost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have one on me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;jpe</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:48:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718756#M74170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan van den Ende</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T06:48:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718757#M74171</link>
      <description>Jan, I am not currently in a position to escalate to HP via support.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am working on a test routine to try to nail down the exact combination of circumstances. However, from my work already, it would appear it be related to the total length of the string returned - not just the 30 chars mentioned by Dr Glasow.&lt;BR /&gt;Currently running the test in different directories with different name/type lengths - but there certainly is a real problem!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718757#M74171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T06:55:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718758#M74172</link>
      <description>After a few experiments, it would appear that we get a problem at specific lengths of the returned strings&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Length  String returned&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; 23 $1$DGA1310:[0,0]AAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 31 $1$DGA1310:[0,0]AAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 39 $1$DGA1310:[0,0]AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 47 $1$DGA1310:[0,0]AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; 31 SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]AAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 39 SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 47 SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt; 55 SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Q;P&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;looks like a problem with lengths (n * 8)-1&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718758#M74172</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T07:13:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718759#M74173</link>
      <description>Duncan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;least of we owe you many thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;We planned on a rolling install of patches next week, but we will definitely leave THIS ONE out!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Proost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have one on me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;jpe</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718759#M74173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jan van den Ende</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T07:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718760#M74174</link>
      <description>I have emailed Mr.DCL&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718760#M74174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T08:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718761#M74175</link>
      <description>Many thanks Ian</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:13:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718761#M74175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T09:13:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718762#M74176</link>
      <description>Thank you for reporting the problem and&lt;BR /&gt;for providing a reproducer. I'll make&lt;BR /&gt;sure the kit will be put on hold first&lt;BR /&gt;thing Monday morning.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Guy</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718762#M74176</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guy Peleg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-28T13:21:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718763#M74177</link>
      <description>The V5 kit fixed a problem related to &lt;BR /&gt;memory management within DCL. The fix&lt;BR /&gt;is in the area of memory allocation making&lt;BR /&gt;sure that the amount of memory being allocated is the same amount being freed.&lt;BR /&gt;Sounds trivial..? yes...but it's a little&lt;BR /&gt;harder than it sounds....;-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, we fixed the problem and expect to&lt;BR /&gt;ship a new kit VMS732_DCL-V0600 later this &lt;BR /&gt;week. In the meanwhile the V5 kit will be &lt;BR /&gt;put on hold.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for any inconvenience&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Guy</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718763#M74177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Guy Peleg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-30T07:44:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718764#M74178</link>
      <description>Guy, many thanks for a rapid response and resolution.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718764#M74178</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-30T09:33:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with AXPVMS-VMS732_DCL-V0500</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718765#M74179</link>
      <description>the updated patch has been announced&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.openvms.org/stories.php?story=06/02/01/1650225" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.openvms.org/stories.php?story=06/02/01/1650225&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but I can't see it on the ftp site yet&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="ftp://ftp.itrc.hp.com/openvms_patches/alpha/V7.3-2" target="_blank"&gt;ftp://ftp.itrc.hp.com/openvms_patches/alpha/V7.3-2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/problem-with-axpvms-vms732-dcl-v0500/m-p/3718765#M74179</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ian Miller.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-02T05:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

