<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)? in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788505#M76454</link>
    <description>One issue, please be sure to &lt;BR /&gt;install Backup-0500 which will&lt;BR /&gt;reduce /IO_LOAD by default to 8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That would be the same as reducing DIOLM to &lt;BR /&gt;8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have fun.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 14:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>comarow</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-16T14:03:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788501#M76450</link>
      <description>HP OpenVMS Alpha Version 7.3-2 Cover Letter includes the following item: &lt;BR /&gt;Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Questions: &lt;BR /&gt;1. I'd like to know whether and what VMS Patch kit(s) may have addressed this (I downloaded 15 kits in prep for OpenVMS v7.2-1 to V7.3-2 upgrade but don't see this item in kit docs).&lt;BR /&gt;2. What does “many LUNs” (more than ~24 LUNs configured) mean (have 24+ Units in HSG80's)? &lt;BR /&gt;3. Can someone quantify “Heavy I/O Load” in this context?  &lt;BR /&gt;4. Do I possibly need HSG ACS firmware update to prevent this (need/use ACS v8.6F-13 to allow SWCC to work in our SAN config, so am hesitant to change ACS; v8.7 would not work). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If VMS patch kit(s) address this then I'm not as concerned with questions 2 and 3. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help/suggestions will be appreciated.  Thx!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788501#M76450</guid>
      <dc:creator>JF Muench</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T16:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788502#M76451</link>
      <description>I seem to remember that an ACS upgrade was released to fix this problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I believe that the newer versions of OpenVMS were so optimised that they could flood the HSG and make it fall over.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There was a long thread on this on the ITRC a while ago, but for the life of me I can't find it now.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Reducing DIOLM may of been one of the workarounds, but don't quote me on that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I find the thread I'll post it here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 17:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788502#M76451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson Humber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T17:37:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788503#M76452</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/fibre/OpenVMS_SAN_Update_files/OPENVMS_SAN_UPDATE.PPT" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/fibre/OpenVMS_SAN_Update_files/OPENVMS_SAN_UPDATE.PPT&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 18:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788503#M76452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson Humber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T18:08:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788504#M76453</link>
      <description>Jeff, &lt;BR /&gt;Thanks so much for your prompt repsonse! &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I read HP OpenVMS SAN/Storage Technical Directions white paper and it appears that work done to back port qfull fix from VMS V8.2 to V7.3-2 (via FIBRE_SCSI-V0400) is likely in DEC-AXPVMS-VMS732_FIBRE_SCSI-V0900 kit (which I downloaded already).  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure if I'll be able to upgrade to HSG ACS 8.8 (may cause other issues for us) but plan to experiment, after VMS 7.2-1 to V7.3-2 upgrade, and probably won't adjust DIOLM (currently 150 with PQL_MBIOLM at 100) as I've been told that DIOLM must be &amp;gt;= PQL_MBIOLM and that related BACKUP issues is addresed via VMS732_BACKUP-V0500 kit (I also plan to install). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been told that this article is dated, so whatever updated information anyone can provide on this will be appreciated. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks - John</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 13:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788504#M76453</guid>
      <dc:creator>JF Muench</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-16T13:55:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788505#M76454</link>
      <description>One issue, please be sure to &lt;BR /&gt;install Backup-0500 which will&lt;BR /&gt;reduce /IO_LOAD by default to 8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That would be the same as reducing DIOLM to &lt;BR /&gt;8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have fun.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 14:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788505#M76454</guid>
      <dc:creator>comarow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-16T14:03:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual-Controller HSGnnn with Many LUNs Can Crash Under Heavy I/O Load (VMS v7.3-2)?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788506#M76455</link>
      <description>Thanks Bob!  &lt;BR /&gt;I'm speaking with HP Storage team (Dean M) now.  Please call Thurs PM or Friday (as discussed). &lt;BR /&gt;Best - John</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 14:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/dual-controller-hsgnnn-with-many-luns-can-crash-under-heavy-i-o/m-p/3788506#M76455</guid>
      <dc:creator>JF Muench</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-16T14:40:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

