<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive? in Operating System - OpenVMS</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985429#M77488</link>
    <description>Thanks for the explanation.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dana Conroy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-12T10:09:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985424#M77483</link>
      <description>I attempted a cluster install of the Availability Manager collector on VMS 7.3-2 AXP, but aborted the attempt upon discovering that the recovery data for installed patches would be deleted (output appended below).  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have never installed any version of Availability Manager in the past - I reviewed the installation guide and the release notes, but do not recall seeing any mention regarding the patch recovery data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is the removal of recovery data required by Availability Manager, or is this a normal function of PCSI?  Is there a way to install the collector on all cluster nodes without sacrificing the patch recovery data?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;Dana&lt;BR /&gt;==========================================&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;$ product install avail_man_col/config=(output=am_config.pcf)&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;The following product has been selected:&lt;BR /&gt;    HP VMS AVAIL_MAN_COL V2.5-BAV          Layered Product&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Do you want to continue? [YES] Y&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Information has been saved to allow you to uninstall the following patches:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;RECOVERY DATA SET 001 created 1-MAY-2006 17:09:37.07&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;INTERVENING entries="" snipped=""&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;RECOVERY DATA SET 008 created 25-APR-2006 16:04:16.40&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;* If you continue, recovery data for the patches listed above will be deleted.&lt;BR /&gt;* The deletion of recovery data does not affect the installation status of&lt;BR /&gt;* patches applied to products that are not participating in this operation.&lt;BR /&gt;* However, continuing with this operation prevents you from uninstalling&lt;BR /&gt;* these patches at a future time by use of the PRODUCT UNDO PATCH command.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Do you want to continue? [NO] N&lt;BR /&gt;%PCSIUI-I-USERABORT, operation terminated by user request&lt;/INTERVENING&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985424#M77483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dana Conroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-14T13:04:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985425#M77484</link>
      <description>It's not specific to this product, but is a&lt;BR /&gt;consequence of the (goofy?) defaults in&lt;BR /&gt;PRODUCT INSTALL.  As the help (VMS V7.3-2)&lt;BR /&gt;reveals:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PRODUCT&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  INSTALL&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    /SAVE_RECOVERY_DATA&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;          /SAVE_RECOVERY_DATA&lt;BR /&gt;          /NOSAVE_RECOVERY_DATA (default)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I believe that if you fail to say /SAVE when&lt;BR /&gt;you install the patches, that you're doomed&lt;BR /&gt;like this when you next install any non-patch&lt;BR /&gt;product.  (Someone else may know better, of&lt;BR /&gt;course.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Having learned this the hard way, I figured&lt;BR /&gt;that I'd start doing it all right after I&lt;BR /&gt;upgrade to VMS V8.x.  Assuming that I can&lt;BR /&gt;remember, every time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If there's a way out of this situation which&lt;BR /&gt;does not involve flushing all the RECOVERY&lt;BR /&gt;DATA SETs, I've missed it.  But you _do_ feel &lt;BR /&gt;good when the installer asks if you'd like to &lt;BR /&gt;save the stuff when you install the patches.&lt;BR /&gt;More's the pity that you now need to discard&lt;BR /&gt;the whole mess of saved stuff.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But, perhaps I'm just a dope, and the&lt;BR /&gt;situation is really better than I think.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:50:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985425#M77484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-14T13:50:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985426#M77485</link>
      <description>If you want to use /SAVE as a "default" qualifier for the PRODUCT command why not set a global symbol at login to:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PRODUCT == "PRODUCT/SAVE"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That way if you use PRODUCT it will automatically use PRODUCT/SAVE.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Phil</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985426#M77485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phillip Thayer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-14T14:07:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985427#M77486</link>
      <description>I receive the same response (i.e. recovery data will be deleted), whether I use "$ product install/save avail_man_col /config=(output=am_config.pcf)" or "$ product install/nosave avail_man_col /config=(output=am_config.pcf)".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, a Google search of some of the message text pointed me to the HP WEBES installation manual.  The manual indicates that the reader should note that patches previously installed with /SAVE will become unremoveable, but one should proceed with the installation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985427#M77486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dana Conroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-14T14:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985428#M77487</link>
      <description>Dana,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Recovery data sets apply to patches only. Full products use the PRODUCT REMOVE command. Unfortunately, PCSI isn't smart enough to figure out how to roll back patches past a full product installation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  The rationale is that PRODUCT UNDO PATCH would only be used within (say) a week of installation, after which there would be no need to roll back.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  So, when you install a product (any product), you are effectively accepting all previously installed patches as permanent.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  (apologies for the rather clumsy implementation, but the original design was going to only allow ONE patch rollback, so be thankful for what you've got!)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985428#M77487</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Gillings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-14T16:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are the Availability Manager collector and VMS patch recovery data mutually exclusive?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985429#M77488</link>
      <description>Thanks for the explanation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-openvms/are-the-availability-manager-collector-and-vms-patch-recovery/m-p/4985429#M77488</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dana Conroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-12T10:09:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

